Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Mrs.Veena Kumaravel vs Mrs.K.Shakila on 4 July, 2019

Author: Krishnan Ramasamy

Bench: Krishnan Ramasamy

                                                1

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                    Dated : 04.07.2019

                                            Coram

                 The Honourable Mr.Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

                                  C.S.No.285 of 2016
                                          and
                         Application Nos.5559 to 5561 of 2016
                                 & 214 to 216 of 2017

         1.Mrs.Veena Kumaravel

         2.Groom India Salon and Spa Pvt. Ltd.,
           No.9 B, Ganga Griha, 1st Floor,
           Nungambakkam High Road,
           Chennai - 600 034.
           Represented by its Director,
           Mrs.Veena Kumaravel
                                                                ...Plaintiffs

                                             Versus

         1.Mrs.K.Shakila
           Partner
           NB Naturals Beauty Family Saloon and Spa
           Partnership Firm
           Opp Salai Mariamman Kovil,
           Salem Bye Pass Road,
           Lakkiampatti,
           Dharmapuri - 636 705.

                 2.Mr.P.Santhakumar,
                     Partner,
                     NB Naturals Beauty Family Saloon and Spa
                     Partnership Firm
                     Opp Salai Mariamman Kovil,
                     Salem Bye Pass Road,
                     Lakkiampatti,
                     Dharmapuri - 636 705.
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                      2


                 3.Mr.M.Baskaran,
                   Partner,
                   NB Naturals Beauty Family Saloon and Spa
                   Partnership Firm
                   Opp Salai Mariamman Kovil,
                   Salem Bye Pass Road,
                   Lakkiampatti,
                   Dharmapuri - 636 705.

                 4.NB Naturals Beauty Family Saloon and Spa
                   Partnership Firm
                   Opp Salai Mariamman Kovil,
                   Salem Bye Pass Road,
                   Lakkiampatti,
                   Dharmapuri - 636 705.
                   Represented by its Managing Director,
                   G.Thiruvengadamoorthi

                 5.NB Naturals Beauty Family Saloon and Spa
                   #82/2, First Floor, Sri Lakshmi Complex,
                   Opp. Women's Police Station,
                   Krishnagiri Main Road,
                   Bargur - 635 104.

                 6.NB Naturals Beauty Family Saloon and Spa,
                   #92/5, First Floor,
                   Near Maharishi Primary School,
                   Bagalur Road,
                   Hosur - 635 109.
                                                                            ...Defendants


                          This suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 CPC r/w. Order IV Rule
                 1 of the O.S.Rules of the Madras High Court and Sections 11, 29 &
                 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 for the following reliefs:
                          (a) To grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants,
                 their directors, franchisees, licensees, employees, officers, servants,
                 agents and all others acting for an on their behalf from using the
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                        3

                 trademark, trade name and trading style featuring the mark
                 "NATURALS"       or     any   other   name/mark     deceptively      similar   to
                 plaintiffs' mark "NATURALS" in any manner whatsoever, including in
                 relation to its salon/spa/beauty care services or any other business,
                 including all use as part of its signage, business cards, labels,
                 promotional materials, advertisements, domain name/s, company
                 name/s, URLs, e-mail addresses, screen names, user names,
                 website      contents    (whether     or   not   visible),   staff    uniforms,
                 transportation vehicles, documents, reports, data, invoices, receipts,
                 stationery and on any other materials and things on which they are
                 using mark "NATURALS" or anything similar to plaintiff's mark
                 "NATURALS", amounting to infringement of plaintiff's trademark
                 "NATURALS" under Registration No.1414842 in Class 42 that
                 amounts to infringement thereof;
                          (b) To grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants,
                 their directors, franchisees, licensees, employees, officers, servants,
                 agents and all others acting for and on their behalf from using the
                 trademark, trade name and trading style featuring the mark
                 "NATURALS"       or     any   other   name/mark     deceptively      similar   to
                 plaintiff's mark "NATURALS" in any manner whatsoever, including in
                 relation to its salon/spa/beauty care services or any other business,
                 including all use as part of its signage, business cards, labels,
                 promotional materials, advertisements, domain name/s, company
                 name/s, URLs, e-mail addresses, screen names, user names,
                 website      contents    (whether     or   not   visible),   staff    uniforms,
                 transportation vehicles, documents, reports, data, invoices, receipts,
                 stationery, and on any other materials and things on which they are
                 using mark "NATURALS" or anything similar to plaintiff's mark
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                              4

                 "NATURALS", that amounts to passing off the defendant's goods or
                 business or services as those of plaintiff;
                          (c) To grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants,
                 their directors, employees, franchisees, licensees, officers, servants,
                 agents and all others acting for and on their behalf from using the
                 plaintiff's Purple and White Trade Dress as depicted within the plaint
                 in       any   manner     whatsoever,            including   in     relation    to   its
                 salon/spa/beauty care services or any other business, including all
                 use as part of its signage, business cards, labels, promotional
                 materials,       interiors      and    exteriors       of    its    business      place
                 advertisements,        website,       company        name/s,       website     contents
                 (whether or not visible), staff uniforms, transportation vehicles,
                 documents, reports, data, invoices, receipts, stationery, and on any
                 other materials and things on which they are using plaintiff's trade
                 dress of purple and white or anything similar to plaintiff's trade
                 dress, that amounts to passing off the defendant's goods or business
                 or services as those of plaintiff;
                          (d) To grant damages for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- in favour of
                 the plaintiffs and against the defendant and such other damages as
                 may be quantified by appropriate evaluation of the defendants
                 books of account during the course of present proceedings;
                          (e) To grant order of delivery up of any brochures/printed
                 material and/or any material which contributes ultimately to the
                 infringement of plaintiffs trademark for destruction thereof;
                          (f) To direct the defendants for rendition of accounts;
                          (g) Costs.
                                For Plaintiffs            :         No Appearance

http://www.judis.nic.in         For Defendants            :         No Appearance
                                                     5



                                          JUDGMENT

When the matter was called on 02.07.2019, the learned counsel for plaintiffs has filed a Memo before this Court stating that they are no longer representing the plaintiffs and they have transferred the files pertaining to the present suit to the plaintiffs.

Therefore, this Court recorded the said Memo and directed the Registry to print the name of the plaintiffs in the cause list and also adjourned the matter to 04.07.2019 i.e., today.

2. Accordingly, the case is listed today with the names of the plaintiffs being printed in the cause list. However, when the matter is called, there is no representation on both sides. Therefore, this Civil Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Applications are closed.

04.07.2019 mrr Index : Yes/No http://www.judis.nic.in 6 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J., mrr C.S.No.285 of 2016 04.07.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in 7 http://www.judis.nic.in