Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Kadarbhai Jusabbhai Meman vs State Of Gujarat on 26 September, 2014

Author: R.D.Kothari

Bench: R.D.Kothari

         R/CR.MA/12658/2014                                      ORDER




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDERS) NO.
                                12658 of 2014

================================================================
               KADARBHAI JUSABBHAI MEMAN....Applicant(s)
                              Versus
                  STATE OF GUJARAT....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MS TEJAL A VASHI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KP RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.D.KOTHARI

                              Date : 26/09/2014


                                ORAL ORDER

1. The applicant prays for release of passport which came  to be deposited by the applicant pursuant to the order passed by 3 rd  Additional   Sessions   Judge,   Rajkot   in   Criminal   Misc.   Application  No.702 of 2012.

2. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant.

3. It appears that applicant is facing trial for the offence  under   Sections   498­A,   323,   504,   411   of  IPC.     Learned  advocate  submits   that   present   applicant   is   accused   No.8   in   the   criminal  complaint filed by the wife.   It was also pointed out that present  applicant has preferred the quashing petition wherein the stay has  been granted by this Court and the said petition is pending. 

4. Rule.  Learned APP Mr.K.P.Raval waives service of Rule  Page 1 of 2 R/CR.MA/12658/2014 ORDER on behalf of State - respondent.  

5. Applicant submits that he is engaged in import­export  business and for the said purpose, he is required to travel abroad.  In support of this, the applicant has produced relevant document at  Annexure 'B'.   Applicant has filed undertaking dated 27.08.2014,  making   declaration   on   oath   that   whenever   he   is   required   to   go  abroad, he would furnish full schedule with detail about the place  to   which   he   intends   to   travel   in   advance   to   concerned   Police  Station i.e. Rajkot Mahila Police Station.

6. Considering the material on record including the order  passed by this Court ­ Annexure 'G', present application is allowed.  Trial Court is ordered to release the applicant's passport and hand  over to the applicant.   Upon hearing the learned advocate for the  parties, it is further directed that if the applicant is required to stay  abroad for more than six months at a stretch, he would require to  seek prior permission of the Court.

7. With   above   observations   and   directions,   present  application is disposed of.  Rule is made absolute.

Direct service is permitted.

(R.D.KOTHARI, J.) Amar Page 2 of 2