Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Pandiyan vs The Assistant Commissioner on 28 January, 2025

Author: P.T. Asha

Bench: P.T. Asha

                                                                            W.P.No.1895 of 2025

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 28.01.2025

                                                    CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

                                              W.P.No.1895 of 2025
                                                     and
                                             W.M.P.No.2173 of 2025

                   Pandiyan                                                  ... Petitioner
                                                          Vs.


                   1. The Assistant Commissioner,
                      Office of the Assistant Commissioner,
                      Land Reforms Department, Coimbatore - 18.

                   2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                      Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer,
                      Udumalaipettai Taluk, Tiruppur District.

                   3. The Tahsildar,
                      Office of the Tahsildar,
                      Udumalaipettai Taluk, Tiruppur District.              ...Respondents
                   Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                   praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the
                   records pertaining to impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent by its
                   proceeding vide File No.2024/0103/32/596452 dated 30.07.2024, and
                   quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and further
                   directing the respondents 2 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation
                   dated 29.02.2024 enable him to pay the value of the property of dry land
                   measuring to an extent of 1.00 Acre comprised in Survey No.701 situated

                   1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              W.P.No.1895 of 2025

                   at Kallapuram Village, Udumalpet Village, Coimbatore District now
                   Tiruppur District for making conversion from conditional patta into ayan
                   patta land within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

                                  For Petitioner      : Mr.S.Arivazhagan

                                  For Respondents     : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan,
                                                         Additional Government Pleader
                                                       ********
                                                      ORDER

The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief:

(i) The case of the petitioner that the dry land measuring 1.00 acre, comprised in Survey No.701, situated at 91, Kallapuram Village, Udumalpet Village, Coimbatore District (now Tiruppur District), was assigned to the petitioner's husband by the first respondent's proceedings dated 07.05.1996 under a Deed of Assignment of Surplus Land under Section 94 of the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act 1961.
(ii) The petitioner's husband has been in possession and enjoyment of the land since the date of the assignment and has meticulously adhered to the terms and conditions of the assignment.
(iii) The petitioner submits that even after 20 years, the patta in respect of the property continued to be a conditional patta. Therefore, a representation was made requesting its conversion into an absolute (iron) patta.
2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1895 of 2025

(iv) On 29.02.2024, a representation was made for the said conversion. However, there was no response, and the request was renewed once again on 30.07.2024, which also did not yield the desired result. Therefore, aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsels on either side.

3. A perusal of the documents indicates that the petitioner's request was rejected on the ground that a conditional patta had already been issued to him. The impugned order is a one-line, non-speaking order, and the lack of application of mind on the part of the third respondent is evident from the fact that the very request of the petitioner was to convert the conditional patta into an absolute (iron) patta. However, the impugned order merely states that the property is under a conditional patta as the reason for rejection.

4. Considering that the impugned order is a non-speaking one and does not provide reasons, the Writ Petition is allowed. The impugned order is set aside, and the matter is remitted back to the 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1895 of 2025 third respondent for fresh consideration. The third respondent shall grant the petitioner a personal hearing and thereafter pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, the connected W.M.P is closed.

28.01.2025 nvi Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To:

1. The Assistant Commissioner, Office of the Assistant Commissioner, Land Reforms Department, Coimbatore - 18.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Udumalaipettai Taluk, Tiruppur District.
3. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Udumalaipettai Taluk, Tiruppur District.
4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1895 of 2025 P.T. ASHA. J., nvi W.P.No.1895 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.2173 of 2025 28.01.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis