Supreme Court - Daily Orders
Flipkart Internet Private Limited vs Competition Commission Of India on 9 August, 2021
Bench: Chief Justice, Vineet Saran, Surya Kant
1
ITEM NO.27 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IVA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.11558/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23072021
in WA No. 562/2021 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at
Bengaluru)
FLIPKART INTERNET PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.88885/2021PERMISSION TO PLACE ON
RECORD SUBSEQUENT FACTS, IA No.88882/2021PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES, IA No.89074/2021PERMISSION
TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES, IA NO.94833/2021
APPLN. TO BRING SUBSEQUENT FACTS/DOCUMENTS ON RECORD & IA
NO.94840/2021APPLN. SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE ADDL. DOCUMENTS
ALONG WITH ANNEXURES)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 11615/2021 (IVA)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.89653/2021EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.89656/2021EXEMPTION FROM
FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.90038/2021EXEMPTION FROM FILING
AFFIDAVIT and IA No.89654/2021PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF
DATES and IA No.89657/2021PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES and IA No.90035/2021PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 09082021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
For Petitioner(s)
Signature Not Verified
Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Sr.Adv.
Digitally signed by
Vishal Anand
Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Sr.Adv.
Date: 2021.08.09
17:31:18 IST
Reason:
Mr. Anand S. Pathak, Adv.
Mr. Amit K. Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Shashank Gautam, Adv.
Mr. Shashank Manish, AOR
Ms. Sreemoyee Deb, Adv.
2
Ms. Smriti Shah, Adv.
Ms. Anubhuti Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Nikhil Joy, Adv.
Ms. Nidhi Sahay, Adv.
Ms. Gunjan Richharia, Adv.
Mr. Pavan Bhushan, Adv.
Ms. Ujwala Uppaluri, Adv.
Mr. Pratibhanu Singh Karola, Adv.
Ms. Raksha Agarwal, Adv.
Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr.Adv.
Ms. Pallavi Shroff, Adv.
Ms. Shweta Shroff, Adv.
Ms. Manika Brar, Adv.
Mr. Aashish Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Yaman Verma, Adv.
Mr. Chaitanya Safaya, Adv.
Ms. Neetu Ahlawat, Adv.
Ms. Nandita Chauhan, Adv.
Mr. Shivang Singh, Adv.
Mr. Apurv Jain, Adv.
Mr. L.Nidhiram Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Nisha Kaur Uberoi, Adv.
Mr. Gautam Chawla, Adv.
Mr. Akshay Nanda, Adv.
Ms. Shambhvi Sinha, Adv.
Ms. Aditi Khemani, Adv.
Ms. Akrathi Shetty, Adv.
Mr. Ishan Arora, Adv.
Mr. S. S. Shroff, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG
Ms. Madhavi Divan, ASG
Mr. Arjun Krishnan, AOR
Mr. Harish B. Narasappa, Adv.
Mr. Ankur Singh, Adv.
Mr. Suhaas R. Shenoy, Adv.
Mr. Shourya Bari, Adv.
Mr. Abir Roy, Adv.
Mr. T. Sundar Ramanathan, AOR
Mr. Gautamaditya Sridhara, Adv.
Mr. Ishaan Chakrabarti, Adv.
Mr. Vivek Pandey, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.
3Having heard Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11615/2021, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11558 of 2021, learned Solicitor General appearing for the Respondent – Competition Commission of India and carefully perusing the material available on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the High Court of Karnataka dismissing the Writ Appeals of the petitioners.
The Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. At this stage, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned Senior counsel submits that time to reply to the notice issued by the Office of the Director General, Competition Commission of India is going to expire on 982021 and prays for extension of time.
Taking into consideration the request made by the learned Senior counsel, time to reply to the notice is extended by a further period of four weeks from today.
It is made clear that no further extension of time would be granted for the purpose.
Consequent upon dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions, all the pending applications filed in the matters also stand disposed of.
(VISHAL ANAND) (R.S. NARAYANAN) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH)