Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Jose Rapheal Manjaprakaren vs Cbdt on 11 October, 2011

                                   1


              Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama 
                     Place, New Delhi­110066
     Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

              Appeal : No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000356 

 Appellant /Complainant        :         Sh. Jose Raphael 
Manjapraklaren,Valsad 
Public Authority               :         Income Tax Department, 
Valsad
                               (Sh. Shaurya S. Shukla - 
through video
                               Conferencing) 

Date of Hearing                :         11 October 2011   
Date of Decision               :         11 October 2011

Facts:­ 

1. Appellant   submitted   RTI   application   dated   15  July 2010 before the CPIO, office of the Commissioner  of   Income   Tax,Valsad   to   seek   information   pertaining  to   Income   Tax   raid   conducted   in   the   house   of   the  appellant   and   his   wife   Smt   Sonal   Jose   Raphael   -  enclosed herewith as Annexure A.

2. CPIO   forwarded   point   'f   'to   the   additional  Commissioner of Income Tax,  Valsad. 3. Vide   Order  dated   26   July   2010,   appellant   was   informed   that  information  as sought  under  points   'a -e ' was  held  by   DGIT   (investigation)   which   organisation   is  exempted   under   the   RTI   Act.   The   ITO   (Ward   -     4),  Valsad   informed   by   this   letter   of   20   August   2010,  that action had been taken as per section 11 of the  Act   and   the   third­party  had   denied   consent   for  disclosure   of  requested   information   which   was  personal to her. 

4. Appellant  preferred  appeal   dated  28 August  2010  before the first appellate authority.

5. Matter   was   disposed   of   vide   FAA   order   dated   23  September 2010 vide which appellant was informed that  the third­party had file returns for AY - 2009 - 10  and   for   earlier   years   no   return   had   been   filed   by  her.   Also   that   there   was   no   complaint   against   the     Appeal : No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000356  2 third­party   and   that   no   raid   by   the   Income   Tax  Department had been conducted on the appellant or the  third­party.

6. Appellant moved the Commission in second appeal.  Matter was heard today. Respondent representing DG IT  (   Inv)   was   present   as   above   at   Valsad   and   made  submissions   via   videoconferencing.   Appellant   did   not  appear.   Respondent   stated   that   his   organisation   was  listed   in   the   Second   Schedule   of   the   RTI   Act   which  read with section 24, listedexempted Organizations. 

Decision notice

7. Commission   has,   after   perusing   the   facts   on  record   and   hearing   the   averments   of   the   respondent,  concluded   that   there   is   no   further   obligation   of  disclosure by the respondent and that all information  as   held   by   them   has   already   been   provided   to   the  appellant. Appeal is dismissed. 

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Under Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­
1.  Shri Jose Raphael Manjaprakaren Plot No. 6, Satyam Society Mission Colony, Halar Road Valsad­396001(Gujarat)
2. The CPIO Dy.Director of Income Tax (Inv.) Aashish Building, Opp: GEB (Old RTO) Madanwad, Valsad­396001 (Gujarat)
3. The Appellate Authority Director of Income Tax (Inv.) Aashish Building, Opp: GEB (Old RTO)    Appeal : No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000356  3 Madanwad, Valsad­396001 (Gujarat)          Appeal : No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000356