Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 12, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Asim Kumar Mallick @ Raju vs Unknown on 4 July, 2023

04.07.2023                          C.R.M. (A) 2353 of 2023
   Sl. 41
Court No. 29
  Sourav
               In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
 (Rejected)    the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nandigram
               Police Station Case No. 361 of 2017 dated 27.09.2017 under
               Sections 363/366 IPC added with Sections 368/ 370/ 372/
               373/ 379/ 376 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

                                               And

               In the matter of: Asim Kumar Mallick @ Raju
                                                                      ....petitioner.

                  Mr. Amal Krishna Samanta
                  Mr. Arun Kumar Das
                                                               ...for the petitioner.

                  Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury
                  Mr. Mainak Gupta
                                                                    ...for the State.


               1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. There being direct allegation of rape of the victim by the present petitioner in the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C, we are not inclined to exercise our discretion under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in favour of the petitioner at this stage, though charge-sheet is stated to be submitted in the meantime and specially, for the fact that the petitioner remained absconding for about six years.

3. Accordingly, the prayer for the anticipatory bail is rejected.

4. The application being CRM (A) 2353 of 2023 is dismissed.

(Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.) 2