Karnataka High Court
Smt Sheshubai Yaligar W/O Narayan ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 March, 2008
Author: Anand Byrareddy
Bench: Anand Byrareddy
IN TH3 HIGH COURT OF RhRNhEAKI.A! IAHGALORB nmrnn ms was 24"' um or mm zoos nnmnn llfl.'I'lI lffiliffllfl 'llfl 'IfIfllI!'Il'9B fillfilfl V' f- alrlfl III-Pl' HUN HIl\I\l\JHld|ufl FIIVFHI HUlU'I:?'?__ZIlJlF.Vv --_' wnrr PETITION No.12o.w2oo7 (G1!-'- _i§'.--'!.lV' :f T' ' EITUIIN: EMT SH'E5'HUEHI 'MLIGAR ITO NJIRAYJIN YALIGAR REED ABOUT 79 YEARS GEE: EIL nmr unxmu mm; 'I111 f.'l,.'h"|l.lf:'l. L mu ulavsiurtup BILGADM DISTRICT 1 I la :75'! J: (av $831'. 1;. 1 1s"r:a-3'3' or pa? '1'_I'£3 gzcnmmg nnpxmmwr .03 'n;éA:=~;" -;1=r;»a:I.r".r-1-r:.:n.:_.- 23:351..-11:4: . -- JIU [aTII3.Tt3R.ITED -B01 WING am-as:-.:. age: ." *J;f' ... RISPONBINTS 3'?"-.3l*!T§".'f\¥1«*i"a0UPER PIJEBAII, HUG?! ?9IS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ISTICLIS " 2T2*-'E. A!-JD 2-3? 1.3!' E ¢.1.EI!Lf§'1'L'1'1.i'!'I9_h! Q!' EILDIQ; !!.l.YI!~!I'5 ' W'--f_J_.5QUA5H '3'!-II IMPUGNID ORIIIR HM'!!! 1.4.2000 PASSED ]B"'." R.'..*.5""'*"""'--'-1"' $9.1 I!'-.' £0.$9!BPP.PJ511.+'PF9.'99; I' €§If$IU I " fnmmnoan vznx amunsunn-r mo ALSO Q1133!-I -rm: nunnnuun-sum I'\l.I,'lII|I'\ 'I -1 anti: 1-aaunin II nwnnnnnflmln ntuuunannnlux unuau Ln raau-uv l.Dl!Ul'.|l-I I-'I HHUFUIIUDHJ 190.1 1!! H0.C.P:P:flUE/113/Pl"3-2005 VIBE ANNEIIURI-G ilfifi fi'I'.iiiIT'.I'T.' % ifiififiiififi Tfi ?i'\'Y' ffiifi fifiifi PENSION TO THE PETITIONS}! INCLUDING THE, JIRREHIIS S'I'O1'PB1.'.1 111233 'PO '1'!-fl IMPUGNID ORJJIR. 5 THIS WRIT PETITION COHING ON FOR HEARING "I-1.1.5 fiFt"l',. '.l"ti'§' fifiiii'-6'5' WE 'F'!-ii FGi'.:iaGI.I.iiGi ORDIR Hoard tho counsel for 1:_l_m. »pot1--t1d':$41f.'ii1>a§'..i:i*afi"" counsel for than xaspondantaf, 2. It is the petiti<;f§6i.§':f:"aIVV_vcIV"ai* :aho is a F1:-oedom Fiqhtgr. :*z@§-'t:i.<_::l.:.vat'?.Ao:V-Alvv in the quit India )§¢vomfiAt..v:3-A'? i _'."-.V'9II2. she was arrested by 1°£a1im 7ais.§ 't€egx.t.:V.T'in cantul Jail. at 1.1219 =g§--_ mg g Lg; maths, Fonsi-an 'fiuieaw, i5i§'i§;.7 the petitioner had. an "G in "'a1..¢ng with nil nacussuy documents, :'Ieaki.:Af«-g.% 'yéngian. was second rupondant sitar 'Ijfixdih-E".".ja:ji::'fizquiry in this regard submitted a r-;§qr*t "fire:-o the first roapondont and had V. x::mf_:onifii§ndod tor grant: of Freedom Fighter': '' "'._ paur:'Asian. Arte: xocaipt at the enquiry 1-apart. .--?§1:ha rirat raapondant grant-Id Freedom rightu-'5 Pnnsian to tho petitioner on 20.5.1992, with iii per month. The same was extended Iron tyne to enquiry in so for as ijae iireegioie' *-.1'*:'Lq'ii:'_'iV§e_e_;'e*.'s 9 pension and the .rec1p:!.m_a1:a «thereon 9' reoafieoty to Financial Veer 199991.:-jazz an'o. 9&9'1§a2k4§ao; with retrospective "fie said direction, the eecond said to have issued no§.i'oe :V1'to 9.:$et§I§t%i§;neef:j'oirectinq her to produce support: or her entietlemejsée "pension. The petitioner hm: :'1..§9;;eaoed*1':-V.,§:;fgd.'v'4'Vgiefooooed she documents. The 9 Qgoieevex, without consideration V aefiioulars, hat: §i..i'fiuu's"6iia'| a revert 'oeufare the ._ ':Z"i;i.,:?s'i;::"";:es::§:xio'ent recommending fox: cancellation of the .p'e:ioion granted in favour of the petitioner. 9 frhe. float respondent had thereafter issued a show
x"V'--..V"«s=afI..'é:ee notice to the petitioner on 20.1.1999 to appear: on 28.8.1999 along with the relevant records 1.: any. in support. ox her case. It 1 admitted that the petitioner on account of her old age and 111.-health had failed to appear Q?» {H-
barore the authority on 23.8.1999. It "is in this herkgrnunei the rirrh reg9-n§nn§-9 hr- preceeded tr cancel the gensian granteé in figvrur fl.
fr :3! Q 111 it matter. the petitioner ir hnfirrei this" fingrh necking an appropriate uirecfiinn or a grin tn theg raapandante to raauna £hn9yayman#9fi§ hnneion on the bani: or the §agumnn£r9rhirh_ara eafight to be produced along with the writ_n§ti:i¢n.
3. entered appearance h'""""5ii9fixiéhntnnanriin£m~$bjactians to contend Itharaeinra tn; paririnnar has railed to appear on tr--r najri e;=._._.g9 _-:!.é.t.;.:"':_r:n.t! prnguge the :_=_ln:_:t.1_nI.:an1;r in 'K_énnuiry; ir is on the basis of the finding that there' nu material available in support of the 9"n petitioner's care that tha'panaion has haan with- 99r=heid and thererore, the impugned order rnnnot be Héfaultod. The Khrnateka state Freedom Fighter':
Pension Rules. 1969, and Ru1o~T in particular. invast the authority' with power to investigate hither to grant or otherwise. at the pension and
5.
. ft:'nc _V'1rga§'*~.vi9§5 without the esteilinifzian irriguiir. Tm': ifimittifi iynsitinaa 1:. petitioner hlti feiieci to g;o6ucn""t3iiv » "a;ciginni~~ , document: would clinnh to the ' seek diaminal. or the g%1:_iti6n.,v_""*
4. 2.3: ww Q£'~..,r¢jV'.fli:.ne petifiianer has new produced Innte.u:§'iai_uVs'i','v'_a:'V:¢':f'V en.i_l::V:iéAi';V._n!n1__:'1';iato nor can that thorn ;naudeA'ji§nni.nih_§g- I part in having availed ._tf;'§'gej"v.:>5.'.'i;u:-at instance. The Inuit not having agpaarod V A 28.B,1!_I!_I!:I, am: not disan*.:i£:.;.n., :V.9;':e4V'Ag§.~!::;*'.;n'!'.innei- tn the geneien which nitéie réaeivinfi after the xvii' ._ Vnhtséumenta in support of 'her: case. The éuhenqunnt default cannot: but held against the .. V9_ot:..ivt§.-anaur and hence suite 3 Iurthor '' ceinaiueration by the roepondente Ion resumption or the payment qr pension.
5. In the light: at the petitioner having produced documents along with rejoinder in 6 II Lu_!.:_l.;1;i.an to Annoazuzga-A to D produced along with are new praducou' in supportlof ,h§:: ue:a§g'.'--«. 4' ' '
6. Accordingly, _wx:itV. is' allow-ad.' Thu _ jinx; 'dirictod to ruconaidor the can; to: grant.
at pansiqm-- gndo1§__AVV' Rules and in acccrdanc3§":»_"----wf';i;¢::25;__ a period of tour mnthu; thn dnt:-5 at ucoipt at thia order.
Sd,/-5 _ judge mf-