Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Sundaram Finance Limited vs Mr.K.Subramaniam on 10 September, 2020

Author: N.Sathish Kumar

Bench: N.Sathish Kumar

                                                                        Application No.8864 of 2019


                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATE: 10.09.2020

                                                     CORAM

                                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                                 A.No.8864 of 2019

                 Sundaram Finance Limited,
                 rep. by its Senior Manager (Legal),
                 Mr. S.Sornaraj,
                 21, Patullos Road,
                 Chennai-600 002.                                             ... Applicant

                                                        Vs

                 Mr.K.Subramaniam,
                 S/o. Mr. K.Karuppanna Gounder,
                 Old No.19-B, N.No.40,
                 Kamarajar Street, Tambaram,
                 Chennai-600 045.                                             ... Respondent

                 PRAYER :            Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side

                 Rules r/w Section 9(ii) (b) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

                 1996, praying to pass an order of appointment of an Advocate Commissioner

                 to seize and deliver the machinery with accessories morefully described in

                 the schedule herein available at the respondent premises or wherever found

                   Page
http://www.judis.nic.in   1/4
                                                                              Application No.8864 of 2019


                 and with whomsoever it is found and entrust the custody of the same to the

                 applicant, and permit the Advocate Commissioner to obtain police aid and to

                 break open the premises.

                                  For Applicant       :         Mr.S.Suresh

                                  For Respondent      :         Mr.Abhishek for
                                                                M/s.AL. Ganthimathi

                                                          ORDER

This application has been filed praying to pass an order of appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the machinery with accessories morefully described in the schedule herein available at the respondent premises and entrust the custody of the same to the applicant, and permit the Advocate Commissioner to obtain police aid and to break open the premises.

2. This Court is of the view that such order cannot be granted in this application. Once the award is passed, when time for filing the application to set aside the award is expired, the award has to be enforced as a decree of Civil Court as per Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Without Page http://www.judis.nic.in 2/4 Application No.8864 of 2019 enforcing the award as per law, one cannot convert Section 9 application at execution proceedings. Such application is entertained and continued, this Court is of the view that the very object of Section 9 of the Act would be defeated. In such view of the matter, it is well open to the applicant to enforce the award as per law by executing the same in an appropriate forum. Accordingly, this application is closed.

10.09.2020 rpp Page http://www.judis.nic.in 3/4 Application No.8864 of 2019 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

rpp A.No.8864 of 2019 10.09.2020 Page http://www.judis.nic.in 4/4