Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Neelam Kumari And Others on 27 January, 2014

Author: K. Kannan

Bench: K. Kannan

                   IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                          CHANDIGARH

                                                         FAO No.1260 of 1993
                                                         Date of Decision.27.01.2014

             The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.                              ......Appellant
                                                    Versus
             Smt. Neelam Kumari and others                                ......Respondents

             Present:          None for the appellant.

                               Mr. R.K. Bashamboo, Advocate
                               for the insurance company.

             CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

             1.  Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment
                 ?
             2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
             3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
                                                -.-
             K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)

1. The original papers have been burnt in a fire accident that took place on 31.01.2011. A Committee was constituted and papers have been reconstructed with the assistance of the counsel who supplied the copies. Wherever information was available regarding the status of service and counsel were appearing, the cause list gave those details and cases were taken up for hearing. In respect of cases where there was no counsel on record and papers could not be reconstructed, notice had been sent to parties as found in the court registers. In respect of some cases, persons have responded and in many cases nobody has responded.

2. In the above case, the papers have been reconstructed and the cause list gives names of counsel of both sides. There is no representation for the appellant at the time when the matter is called. The appeal is dismissed for default of appearance and non prosecution.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 27, 2014 Pankaj* Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.01.29 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh