Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

National Consumer Disputes Redressal

Porsche India, Volkswagen Group Sales ... vs Deepoak Kapoor & 3 Ors. on 28 March, 2018

          NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION  NEW DELHI          FIRST APPEAL NO. 1908 OF 2017     (Against the Order dated 17/08/2017 in Complaint No. 275/2009     of the State Commission Delhi)        1. PORSCHE INDIA, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP SALES INDIA PVT. LTD.  4T FLOOR, SILVER UTOPIA, CARDINAL GRACIOUS ROAD, CHAKALAANDHERI EAST.  MUMBAI.-400099 ...........Appellant(s)  Versus        1. DEEPOAK KAPOOR & 3 ORS.  R/O. VILLAGE PRITHLA, TEHSIL PATWAL.  FARIDABAD.  HARYANA.  2. MESSRS. SHREYANS MOTORS PVT. LTD.  PORSCHE CENTRE,A-31, MOHAN COOPERATIVE SOCIETY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MATHURA ROAD.  NEW DELHI-110044  3. MESSRS PRECISION CARDS INDIA PVT. LTD.  3, DISTRICT CENTRE JASOLA, 3RD FLOOR.  NEW DEHI-110044  4. MESSRS.  PORSCHE AG, PORSCHEPLATZ70435, STUUGART, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY. ...........Respondent(s) 
  	    BEFORE:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN,PRESIDENT 
      For the Appellant     :      Ms. Ekta Bhasin, Advocate       For the Respondent      :     Mr. Joydeep Sarma, Advocate for R-1
                                             NEMO for others  
 Dated : 28 Mar 2018  	    ORDER    	    

Mr. Joydeep Sarma, who has been engaged by the Complainant to prosecute the Complaint, states that as per his instructions, the Complainant is not interested in pursuing the Complaint against the present Appellant, namely, Porsche India, a division of Volkswagen Group Sales India Pvt. Ltd. 

In view of the statement on behalf of the Complainant, the cause of action, if any, qua the Appellant, leading to the present Appeal, does not survive.  Consequently, the Appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.  Needless to add that the statement made on behalf of the Complainant will have no bearing in so far as the Complaint against other Opposite Parties, as impleaded in the Complaint, is concerned. 

Since the Appeal has been disposed of finally in the above terms, interim order dated 10.10.2017 is vacated.

Since the Complaint was filed as far back as in the year 2009, the State Commission is requested to take a final decision therein as expeditiously as practicable.

The Appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.  No costs.

  ......................J D.K. JAIN PRESIDENT