Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

M/S. Markfed Hdpe Sacks Plant vs Cce, Ludhiana on 19 August, 2015

Bench: A.K. Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman

                                     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2131 OF 2006

                  M/S. MARKFED HDPE SACKS PLANT                          ... Appellant

                                                   VERSUS

                  CCE, LUDHIANA                                          ... Respondent

                                               O R D E R

Since the tax effect is only Rs. 3,79,962/-, we are not inclined to entertain the appeal of the appellant/assessee.

However, insofar as the penalty imposed upon the appellant is concerned, we have gone through the matter and are of the opinion that the penalty of Rs. 80,000/- should be set aside. Ordered accordingly.

The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

.........................., J. [ A.K. SIKRI ] .........................., J. [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ] New Delhi;

August 19, 2015.





Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
Gulshan Kumar Arora
Date: 2015.08.27
17:30:14 IST
Reason:
ITEM NO.109                  COURT NO.13                SECTION III

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No. 2131/2006

M/S. MARKFED HDPE SACKS PLANT                          Appellant(s)

                                   VERSUS

CCE, LUDHIANA                                          Respondent(s)

(With appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 19/08/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Prateek Rusia, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. A. K. Panda, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sushma Manchanda, Adv. Mr. Shankar Divate, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
(Nidhi Ahuja) (Renu Diwan) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER [Signed order is placed on the file.]