Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Prahallad Bhol vs State Of Odisha .... Opp. Party on 17 August, 2022

Author: A.K. Mohapatra

Bench: A.K. Mohapatra

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK


                                   ABLAPL No.9870 of 2022

                 Prahallad Bhol                        ....            Petitioner
                                                        Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate
                                            -versus-
                 State of Odisha                       ....            Opp. Party
                                                            Mr. S. Patra, A.S.C.
                                         CORAM:

                            JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
                                        ORDER
Order No.                              17.08.2022
    01.     1.      This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual
            /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

3. This is an application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner for anticipatory bail.

4. The petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.1221 of 2022, arising out of Jankia P.S. Case No.274 of 2022 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Khurda for commission of offence punishable under Sections 379/34, I.P.C. read with Section 12 of Orissa Mines and minerals (Preven. of Theft Sumgg. Activities) Act. 1989 and Section 51 of Orissa Minerals Concession Rules, 2004.

5. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle which was engaged for transporting laterite stones and he does not have any criminal antecedents.

// 2 //

6. Considering the nature of allegation, gravity of offence and the fact of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, it is directed that in the event the petitioner surrenders before the learned court in seisin over the matter within a period of three weeks from today in the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper.

7. Further, it is directed that the petitioner shall given an undertaking before the learned court below that while releasing on bail, he will ensure that the vehicle will not involve in similar nature of offences failing which this order shall automatically revoked.

Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

8. It is further directed that the bail granted to the petitioner is subject to the condition that learned court below shall verify whether the petitioner has any criminal antecedents of similar nature. In the event it is found that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents of similar nature, this bail order shall automatically stand revoked.

9. It is open for the learned court below, if the petitioner fails to appear in court, then the learned court below shall proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law.

10. Accordingly, the ABLAPL is disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Jagabandhu