Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Saalim Shoes (P) Ltd vs M/S.Vasavi Marketing on 5 July, 2022

Author: N.Sathish Kumar

Bench: N.Sathish Kumar

                                                                         Crl.O.P.Nos.15219, 15223 & 15224 of 2022


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 05.07.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                          Crl.O.P.No.15219, 15223 & 15224 of 2022
                                                             and
                                  Crl.M.P.Nos. 8532, 8523, 8524, 8526, 8528 & 8533 of 2022

                  1.M/s.Saalim Shoes (P) Ltd
                  Represented by its Managing Director
                  Mr.Arcot Mohammed Saalim
                  No.1-A, Regency Apartment, No.5, 1st Lane
                  Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034
                  Factory at No.63/1, 63/2
                  Ammor Road, Manthangal
                  Ranipet, Ranipet District- 632 403
                  Tamil Nadu

                  2.Arcot Mohammed Saalim
                  3.Arcot Mohammed Aslam
                  4.Arcot Mohammed Ashfaque
                                                           .. Petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.15219 of 2022

                                                          Versus

                  M/s.Vasavi Marketing
                  Represented by its Power Agent
                  Mr.R.Nagendra Prasad
                  Head Office
                  No.88/A, Vakkil Street
                  Ranipet, Walaja Taluk
                  Ranipet District
                                                          .. Respondent in Crl.O.P.No.15219 of 2022



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                  Page No.1 of 6
                                                                      Crl.O.P.Nos.15219, 15223 & 15224 of 2022


                  Abdul Wahab                             .. Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.15223 of
                  2022

                                                         Versus

                  M/s.Vasavi Marketing
                  Represented by its Power Agent
                  Mr.R.Nagendra Prasad
                  Head Office
                  No.88/A, Vakkil Street
                  Ranipet, Walaja Taluk
                  Ranipet District                      .. Respondent in Crl.O.P.No.15223 of 2022

                  Shakvai Mumtaj Beham                    .. Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.15224 of
                  2022

                                                         Versus

                  M/s.Vasavi Marketing
                  Represented by its Power Agent
                  Mr.R.Nagendra Prasad
                  Head Office
                  No.88/A, Vakkil Street
                  Ranipet, Walaja Taluk
                  Ranipet District                      .. Respondent in Crl.O.P.No.15224 of 2022

                  Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of
                  Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records in pursuant to the S.T.C.No.19 of 2021
                  pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet District.


                                   For Petitioners         : Mr.T.R.Prabakaran (in all cases)

                                                     COMMON ORDER


These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed seeking to quash the Chargesheet in S.T.C.No.19 of 2021 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.2 of 6 Crl.O.P.Nos.15219, 15223 & 15224 of 2022 Court, Ranipet District, for the offence under Section 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.

2. The present petitions have been filed to quash the cheque complaint in S.T.C.No.384 of 2020 mainly on the ground that the management of the petitioner company was taken over by the Corporate Debtor appointed by National Company Law Tribunal, Division Bench – I, Chennai and there was a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Therefore, it is submitted that no complaint is maintainable as against the petitioner company and its Directors.

3. At the outset, I am unable to persuade to the submission of the learned counsel. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of P. Mohanraj and Others vs. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd., reported in [2021 SCC Online SC 152], after dealing with various judgements of the Apex Court in paragraph 103 held as follows:

“103. Since the Corporate debtor would be covered by the moratorium provision contained in Section 14 of the IBC, by which continuation of Section 138/141 proceedings against the corporate debtor and initiation of Section 138/141 proceedings against the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis said debtor during the corporate insolvency resolution Page No.3 of 6 Crl.O.P.Nos.15219, 15223 & 15224 of 2022 process are interdicted, what is stated in paragraphs 51 and 59 in Aneeta Hada (supra) would then become applicable. The legal impediment contained in Section 14 of the IBC would make it impossible for such proceeding to continue or be instituted against the corporate debtor. Thus, for the period of moratorium, since no Section 138/141 proceeding can continue or be initiated against the corporate debtor because of a statutory bar, such proceedings can be initiated or continued against the persons mentioned in Section 141(1) and (2) of the Negotiable Instrument Act. This being the case, it is clear that the moratorium provision contained in Section 14 of the IBC would apply only to the corporate debtor, the natural persons mentioned in Section 141 continuing to be statutorily liable under Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instruments Act.'' As the moratorium applies to the Corporate Debtor, no proceedings under 138/141 can continue or be initiated because of a statutory bar, such proceedings can be initiated or continued against the persons mentioned in Section 141(1) and (2) of the Negotiable Instrument Act. This being the case, it is clear that the moratorium provision contained in Section 14 of the IBC would apply only to the corporate debtor, the natural persons mentioned in Section 141 continuing to be statutorily liable under Chapter XVII of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.4 of 6 Crl.O.P.Nos.15219, 15223 & 15224 of 2022 Negotiable Instruments Act.

4. In such a view of the matter, the petitioners being the directors of the petitioner company, have to be prosecuted as per the above judgment.

5. Such view of the matter, the complaint as against the the petitioner company alone is quashed. In respect of others, the application to quash is dismissed and at this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners citing the age of the petitioners namely Mr.Arcot Mohammed Saalim and Mrs.Shakvai Mumtaj Beham seeks exemption of personal appearance before the Trial Court. Considering the same, personal appearance of the above mentioned petitioners before the Trial Court is dispensed with, except when called for in required circumstances, the afore mentioned petitioners shall be present on the date as fixed by the Trial Court. However, the Trial Court shall proceed as against the other accused and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

6. With the above directions, these Criminal Original Petitions stands partly allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

05.07.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.5 of 6 Crl.O.P.Nos.15219, 15223 & 15224 of 2022 Internet: Yes dhk N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

dhk To

1.Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet District

2. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.15219, 15223 & 15224 of 2022 05.07.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.6 of 6