Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Megacity (Bangalore Builders And ... vs The Income Tax Department on 4 January, 2017

Author: Anand Byrareddy

Bench: Anand Byrareddy

                                1




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
                     BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017

                            BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

           CRIMINAL PETITION No.664 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

1.     Megacity (Bangalore)
       Builders and Developers,
       No.120, Mega Tower,
       K.H.Road,
       Bangalore - 560 027.
       Represented by its Director-
       Sri. C.P.Gangadhareshwara.

2.     Shri C.P.Yogeshwara,
       Managing Director,
       Megacity (Bangalore)
       Builders and Developers,
       Son of Puttamadegowda,
       Aged 52 years,
       No.367, 1st "E" Cross,
       7th Block, Banashankari 3rd State,
       Bangalore 560 085.
                                            ...PETITIONERS

(By Shri Kiran S. Javali, Advocate)
                                 2




AND:

The Income Tax Department,
Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax, Central Circle 1(4),
C.R.Buildings,
Bangalore - 560 001.
By Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik.
                                       ...RESPONDENT

(By Shri Jeevan Neeralagi, Advocate)
                            *****

       This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the order dated
21.10.2015 in C.C.No.51/2012 on the file of the Special Court
(Economic Offences) Bangalore and allow the application filed
under Section 91 read with Section 243(2) of Cr.P.C.

       This Criminal Petition coming on for Admission this day,
the court made the following:

                          ORDER

In view of the petition in Crl.P.1997/2016 having been allowed, the corresponding petition, namely Crl.P.664/2016 is rendered infructuous.

3

Hence, the present petition is dismissed. I.A.1/2016 is disposed of as a consequence.

Sd/-

JUDGE KS