Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Ponnaiyah Ramajeyam Public vs Employees' Provident Fund ... on 23 January, 2020

Author: Pushpa Sathyanarayana

Bench: Pushpa Sathyanarayana

                                                                       W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2020

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED:23.01.2020

                                                     CORAM:

                          THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

                                        W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2020
                                                  and
                                   W.M.P.(MD) Nos.1036 & 1037 of 2020

                 Ponnaiyah Ramajeyam Public
                  Higher Secondary School,
                 Rep. by its Correspondent P.Murugesan,
                 Medical College Road,
                 Thanjavur 613 004                                     ... Petitioner

                                                      Vs.

                 Employees' Provident Fund Organization,
                 Rep. by its Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
                 Regional Office,Trichy.                               ... Respondent


                 PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                 India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records
                 related to the impugned demand letter of the respondent vide No.CB /
                 TRY/7Q INTEREST / C-33 / 82512 / 2019-2020 passed u/s 7Q Employees
                 Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 and the impugned
                 order passed by the respondent in No.CB /TRY /14B DAMAGES /C-33/
                 82512/2019-2020 u/s 14 B of the Act dated 11/12/2019 and quash the
                 same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to desist further
                 proceedings there upon.


                                    For Petitioner    : Mr.Veera Kathiravan, Senior Counsel
                                                        for M/s Veera Associates

                                    For Respondent : Mr.G.Dharmaraja,
                                                     Standing Counsel
http://www.judis.nic.in
                 1/4
                                                                                 W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2020



                                                       ORDER

Mr.G.Dharmaraja, learned standing counsel takes notice for the respondents/Employees Provident Fund Organization.

2. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

3.This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the respondent dated 11.12.2019 vide No.CB /TRY /14B DAMAGES /C-33/ 82512/2019-2020 and quash the same.

4.The respondent has passed an order in proceedings No.CB /TRY /14B DAMAGES /C-33/ 82512/2019-2020, dated 11.12.2019 demanding remittance of dues, which is inclusive of penal damages under Section 14B and interest under Section 7Q of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 against the petitioner herein. The total due as per the order is Rs.8,05,810/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs and Five Thousand Eight hundred and ten only). Even though an appeal remedy is available against this order, the petitioner is willing to comply http://www.judis.nic.in 2/4 W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2020 with the order. But he expresses his inability to make the payment in one stroke. Therefore, he seeks permission from this Court to make the payment in 20 installments.

5. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent would vehemently opposes the proposal made by the petitioner. The learned counsel would submit that 20 installments is too longer period and it should be restricted.

6. After some deliberations, the petitioner agreed that he would pay the demand in fifteen equal monthly installments.

7. Considering the factual circumstances, the petitioner is directed to make the demanded payment in 15 equal monthly installments and the first installment shall be paid on or before 15.02.2020. In case of any default, the respondent is entitled to initiate action in accordance with law.

8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.




                                                                         23.01.2020
                 Index         :Yes / No
                 Internet      :Yes / No
                 sts

http://www.judis.nic.in
                 3/4
                                                                    W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2020

                                                       PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.


                                                                                       sts

                 To:

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Trichy.

Order made in W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2020 Dated:

23.01.2020 http://www.judis.nic.in 4/4