Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh

Bhup Ram Sharma vs D/O Post on 5 July, 2022

                        1


       CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
              CHANDIGARH BENCH

            Hearing by Video Conferencing

               O.A. No.063/983/2020

       Chandigarh, this the 05th day of July, 2022


 HON'BLE SH. SURESH KUMAR MONGA, MEMBER (J)
(On video conference from Central Administrative Tribunal,
Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh)

HON'BLE SH. RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA, MEMBER (A)
(On video conference from Central Administrative Tribunal,
Bangalore Bench, Bangalore)


Bhup Ram Sharma, s/o Shri Mast Ram Sharma, R/o Village
Alloo, PO & Tehsil Theog, District Shimla, presently posted
as GDSMD (Group D), Sub Post Post Office Theog, District
Shimla, HP. 171201

                                             ...Applicant
(BY ADVOCATE: None present)

                    VERSUS

1.   Union of India through the Secretary, Department of
Posts Ministry of Communication, Dak Bhawan, Parliament
Street, New Delhi-110001. [email protected].
2.   Chief Postmaster General, Himachal Pradesh Circle,
Kasumpti, Shimla-171009. [email protected].
3.   Senior Superintendent, Shimla Postal Division, Shimla-
171001. [email protected].
4.   Inspector, Postal Sub-Division, Theog Campt at Rohru-
171201. [email protected].
                                     .....Respondents
(BY ADVOCATE: Sh. Sanjay Goyal)
                          2




                  O R D E R (ORAL)

PER: SURESH KUMAR MONGA, MEMBER (J)

Despite the link having been sent by the Registry of this Tribunal, learned counsel for the applicant has failed to join the Video Conference.

2. A perusal of the record reveals that even on earlier dates of hearing, i.e. 14.07.2021, 08.11.2021, 11.03.2022 and 28.04.2022, nobody had put in appearance on behalf of the applicant.

3. It appears that the applicant has lost his interest in pursuing the present Original Application.

4. The Original Application is, therefore, dismissed in default for non prosecution.





(RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA)             (SURESH KUMAR MONGA)
    MEMBER (A)                         MEMBER (J)

ns