Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Patna High Court - Orders

Shiv Sharan Yadav @ Sheo Sharan Yadav & ... vs The State Of Bihar on 30 November, 2015

Author: Anjana Prakash

Bench: Anjana Prakash, Rajendra Kumar Mishra

          Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.712 of 2015 (3) dt.30-11-2015




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                          Criminal Appeal (DB) No.712 of 2015
                          Arising Out of PS.Case No. -193 Year- 1991 Thana -MUFFASIL District- AURANGABAD
                      ======================================================
                      1. Shiv Sharan Yadav @ Sheo Sharan Yadav,
                      2. Ram Sharan Yadav, Both SI No. 1 to 2 are sons of Laldeo Yadav,
                      3. Ram Ashish Yadav, son of Late Sahdeo Yadav, All resident of village-
                      Hussainbad, P.S. Phacer (Obra) District- Aurangabad.

                                                                                    .... ....   Appellant/s
                                                             Versus
                      The State of Bihar

                                                                     .... .... Respondent/s
                      ======================================================
                      Appearance :
                      For the Appellant/s  :   Mr. Md.Imteyaz Ahmad, Advocate.
                      For the Respondent/s   : Mr. Smt.S.B.Verma (APP)
                      ======================================================
                      CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH
                                and
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
                      ORAL ORDER
                      (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH)

3       30-11-2015

Heard learned counsel for the Appellants and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Appellants seek bail and suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal in connection with Sessions Trial No. 64 of 1992/287 of 2014 pending in the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge- III, Aurangabad.

In view of the nature of evidence against the Appellants, we are not inclined to release them on bail.

Prayer for bail is rejected.




                                                                   (Anjana Prakash, J)


Bhardwaj/-                                                    (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

    U        T