Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Pors And Rao Studio (P) Limited vs Next First Engineering Technologies ... on 28 June, 2012

Author: Ravi Malimath

Bench: Ravi Malimath

                          1



   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE

            ON THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2012

                       BEFORE

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

           COMPANY PETITION NO. 12 OF 2012

BETWEEN

    PORS AND RAO STUDIO (P) LIMITED
    FORMERLY KNOWN AS APPLIED FICTION
    INTERACTION LAB INDIA (P) LTD
    A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE
    PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 &
    HAVING ITS REGTD OFFICE: AT NO.74,
    GAYATHRIDEVI PARK EXTENSION,
    VAYALIKAVAL BANGALORE - 560003
    REPTD. BY ITS DIRECTOR
    MS.APARNA RAO

                                ... PETITIONER

(BY M/S. CRESTLAW PARTNERS, ADVOCATE)

AND :

    NEXT FIRST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES
    PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED
    UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES
    ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGTD OFFICE
    AT NO.355,7TH CROSS, WILSON GARDEN,
    BANGALORE -     560027
    REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR

                                ... RESPONDENT

(BY SRI C K NANDA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

     THIS COMPANY PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION
43(E) & (F) , 434 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956,
PRAYING THAT FOR THE REASONS STATED THEREIN THIS
                                2



HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ORDER THAT THE
RESPONDENT     COMPANY  NEXTFIRST   ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGIES PVT. Land Tribunal., HAVING ITS
REGISTERED OFFICE AT 355, 7TH CROSS, WILSON
GARDEN, BANGALORE 560 027 BE WOUND UP IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES
ACT, 1956 ETC.

      THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-


                            ORDER

A joint memo has been filed by the parties stating that the petitioner has no further claims and that any of the petitioner's claims against the respondent, past or future, shall stand relinquished. Memo is signed by both the counsel.

2. In this view of the matter, the petition does not survive for consideration and is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE Msu