Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Allahabad High Court

Mohd. Siddque @ Saddique vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 22 February, 2021

Bench: Sunita Agarwal, Deepak Verma





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 39
 

 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5240 of 2021
 

 
Petitioner :- Mohd. Siddque @ Saddique
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Umair Mahmood
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
 

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

It is contended that the petitioner had taken a loan from the respondent no.3 for running a bookshop under State Sponsored Scheme in the year 1995-96.

The contention is that the outstanding loan had been set off on an exemption given by the respondent no.3 under the State scheme.

However, after a period of 25 years, a show cause notice dated 2.12.2020 had been issued showing the recovery of 1,89,418/- till 1.12.2020. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the show cause notice.

Considering that the petitioner had been called up to answer the show cause notice, this Court does not find any justification to entertain the challenge. However, it is directed that the petitioner shall submit a proper reply to the show cause notice dated 2.12.2020 giving details of the exemption, if any granted to him. In case, such a reply is filed within a period of three weeks along with the copy of this order, the respondent no.3 would be under obligation to take an expeditious decision, in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks.

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

Order Date :- 22.2.2021 Harshita