Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Shaikh Samran @ Lucky Rashid Shaikh vs The State Of Maharashtra on 7 September, 2020

Author: V.K. Jadhav

Bench: V.K. Jadhav

                                   1                   BA 689.2020.odt

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                  36 BAIL APPLICATION NO.689 OF 2020

         SHAIKH SAMRAN @ LUCKY RASHID SHAIKH
                           VERSUS
              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                               ...
        Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sharma Govind M.
             APP for Respondent : Mr. A M Phule
                               ...
                   CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.
                  Dated : September 07, 2020
                               ...
     PER COURT :-

     1.               The applicant is seeking regular bail in

     connection with Crime No.436 of 2019 registered with

     Pundlik Nagar Police Station, Aurangabad District

     Aurangabad for the offences punishable under section

     489A, 489B, 489C, 489D, 420 r/w 34 of the Indian

     Penal Code. His application with similar prayer bearing

     Criminal Bail application No.694 of 2020 came to be

     rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-10,

     Aurangabad vide order dated 6.6.2020.



     2.               Learned counsel for the applicant submits

     that investigation is over and charge-sheet has been



     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 08/09/2020                ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2020 23:38:45 :::
                                      2                  BA 689.2020.odt

     submitted. The learned counsel submits that as per the

     allegations made in the complaint and as it has been

     revealed during the investigation that one printer came

     to be seized from the applicant alongwith the four

     currency notes of Rs.100/- (Rs. Hundred) denomination

     and further the xerox copies of the said currency notes

     four in number. Learned counsel submits that except

     that there is no connecting evidence against the

     applicant.          Learned counsel submits that this only

     indicates that in the said printer xeroxing of real

     currency notes has been done, however, that hardly

     speaks about making of the fake notes by using some

     other method. Learned counsel submits that there is no

     criminal history.         The applicant has a fxed place of

     residence and the applicant has placed on record copy

     of the Aadhar Card, domicile certifcate, Ration card,

     school leaving certifcate, etc. The applicant has a

     permanent place of residence. He is easily available for

     trial. The applicant may be released on bail.




     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 08/09/2020                 ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2020 23:38:45 :::
                                      3                      BA 689.2020.odt

     3.               Learned A.P.P. has strongly resisted the

     application on the ground that printer with the four

     currency notes of Rs.100/- denomination alongwith the

     xerox copies of the said notes recovered from the

     possession of the applicant. Prima facie, there is strong

     case against the applicant.          The applicant may not be

     released on bail.



     4.               On going through the allegations made in

     the complaint and on perusal of the charge-sheet,

     though I fnd that printer came to be seized from the

     possession of the applicant, however, prima facie, in the

     given set of allegations I hardly fnd that section 489-A

     is attracted, which speaks that whoever counterfeits, or

     knowingly          performs   any    part   of   the     process         of

     counterfeiting, any currency note or bank-note is liable

     for punishment under the provisions of section 489-A of

     the Indian Penal Code.              Further, Section 28 of the

     Indian Penal Code defnes "Counterfeit" and main

     ingredients of the counterfeit are i] one causing one

     thing to resemble another thing, ii] intending by means


     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 08/09/2020                     ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2020 23:38:45 :::
                                      4                   BA 689.2020.odt

     of that resemblance to practise deception, or iii] knowing

     it to be likely that deception will thereby be practiced.



     5.               In the instant case, if with the help of the

     printer, if xeroxing has been done of the currency notes,

     same would hardly attract the counterfeiting as defned

     under section 28 of the IPC. The applicant has a fxed

     place of residence. He is easily available for trial. There

     is no criminal history. I am thus inclined to release the

     applicant on bail. Hence, following order.

                                 ORDER

I. Application is hereby allowed.

II. Applicant SHAIKH SAMRAN @ LUCKY RASHID SHAIKH in connection with Crime No.436 of 2019 registered with Pundlik Nagar Police Station, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad for the offences punishable under section 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D, 420 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, be released on bail on furnishing P.B. of Rs.20,000/-(Rs. Twenty Thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount on the following conditions :-

aaa/-
::: Uploaded on - 08/09/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2020 23:38:45 :::
5 BA 689.2020.odt a] The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence, in any manner.

III. Bail application is accordingly disposed off.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ...

aaa/-

::: Uploaded on - 08/09/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2020 23:38:45 :::