Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Amit Pande vs Department Of Financial Services on 21 September, 2012

                   Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
           Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

                   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000054  

Appellant /Complainant        :       Shri Amit Pande, Gwalior (MP)
Public Authority              :      Department of Financial 
Services (MoF),N.Deli
                              (Sh. Jagbir Singh Phaugat, CPIO)

Date of Hearing               :     21 September  2012 
Date of Decision              :     21 September 2012
  
Facts:­ 

1. Shri Amit Pandey submitted RTI application dated 2 April  2011   before   the   CPIO,   Department   of   Financial   Services,   New  Delhi to seek information regarding the Credit Linked Capital  Subsidy   Technology   Upgradation   Fund   Scheme,   action   taken   on  his   letter   of   30   February   and   proof   of   dispatch   of   letter  dated 17 March 2011 etc.

2. Vide CPIO order dated 30 May 2011, point wise information  was furnished to the appellant.

3. Not being satisfied, appellant preferred appeal dated 21  May 2011 before the first appellate authority. 

4. Matter   was   decided   vide  FAA  order   dated  8   July   2011  by  upholding the order of the CPIO.

5. Appellant preferred second appeal before the Commission. 

6. Matter was heard today via videoconferencing from Gwalior  where   the   appellant   was   present.   CPIO   appeared   in   person.  Appellant   stated   that   he   was   not   satisfied   with   the  information provided to him in respect of point 4 of his RTI  application   and   that   specific   information   sought   by   him   was  not   furnished.   CPIO   submitted   that   information   as   received  from SIDBI had been forwarded to the appellant.

Decision notice    Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000054       

7. After   hearing   both   parties   Commission   directs   CPIO   to  provide   information   pertaining   to   the   specific   rule   under  which,   "job   workers   are   eligible   for   subsidy   under   Credit  Linked   Capital   Subsidy   Technology   Upgradation   Fund   Scheme  (CLCSS -TUF)". Information to be provided within two weeks of  receipt of the order. 

8. In respect of the delay in providing information by the  CPIO, it was submitted that this was on account of the budget  session  of   Parliament.   Commission   accepts   the   explanation   of  the CPIO as credible and closes the case with a warning to the  CPIO   that   in   future   he   must   scrupulously   adhere   to   the  timeframe   provided   under   the   RTI   Act   failing   which   he   will  attract penalty. 

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­
1. Shri Amit Pande 344, Jiwaji Nagar Thatipur,  Gwalior­474011 (MP)
2. The CPIO Department of Financial Services (Vigilance Section), Min. of Finance Jeevan  Deep Building, Parliament Street New Delhi­110001
3. The Appellate Authority Department of Financial Services (Vigilance Section), Min. of Finance Jeevan  Deep Building, Parliament Street New Delhi­110001        Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000054              Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000054