Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

Bablu Kurre vs State Of Chhattisgarh 12 ... on 6 September, 2019

                                           1

                                                                                 NAFR

                    HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                               MCRC No. 5245 of 2019

     Bablu Kurre S/o Ramdev Kurre Aged About 26 Years R/o Village - Bhadra
      Uparpara, Police Station - Pamgarh, District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh

                                                                          ---- Applicant

                                       Versus

     State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station - Dipika,
      District Korba Chhattisgarh

                                                                      ---- Respondent

For Applicant : Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 06/09/2019

1. This is the First Bail Application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested on 13.06.2019 in connection with Crime No.151/2013 registered at Police Station Dipika, District Korba (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 120 (B) 34 IPC.

2. As per the prosecution case, the applicant along with other three co-accused namely Gangotri, Purendra & Indal Singh received an amount of Rs.96000/- on 28.11.2013 from one Dilharan and subsequently on the next date took an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- from one Pawan to double it by the black magic. Subsequently, after the money was given, the applicant who was known as Tantrik Inder fled away, whereas the other co-accused were arrested. The present applicant was arrested on 13.06.2019. 2

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the other three accused were tried and have been acquitted for want of evidence and the amount of Rs.96000/- was initially seized from Gangotri. He would further submit that the applicant is in jail since 13.06.2019, therefore, he may be released on bail.

4. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

5. Considering the facts of this case and the fact that the applicant is in jail since 12.06.2019 and further taking into that the charge-sheet in this case has been filed and the charges have already been framed, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by the said Court.

Sd/-

Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu