Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Kamalpreet Singh vs National Institute Of Pharmaceutical ... on 25 July, 2020

Author: Neeraj Kumar Gupta

Bench: Neeraj Kumar Gupta

                                के ीय सूचना आयोग
                      Central Information Commission
                           बाबा गंगनाथ माग, मुिनरका
                       Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                       नई िद ी, New Delhi - 110067

ि तीय अपील सं      ा / Second Appeal No. CIC/NIPER/A/2018/165159

 Kamalpreet Singh                                       ... अपीलकता/Appellant

                                     VERSUS
                                      बनाम


 The CPIO, M/o Chemicals &                               ... ितवादी /Respondent
 Fertilizer, National Institute of
 Pharmaceutical Education and
 Research, NIPER, Sector -67,
 S.A.S, Nagar(Mohali), Punjab.

Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:

 RTI : 27.07.2018              FA    : 10.09.2018       SA       : 30.10.2018

 CPIO : 31.08.2018             FAO : Not on record      Hearing : 20.07.2020

                                     ORDER

1. The appellant filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), M/o Chemicals & Fertilizer, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, INPER, Sector -67, S.A.S, Nagar(Mohali), Punjab. The appellant seeking information is as under:-

"certified copies of all Annual Rate Contract issued by MPER, Mohali for Laboratory Chemicals, Laboratory Glassware's, Laboratory Filter Papers and Page 1 of 3 other Scientific items on Price List as well as on item wise list for the year 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19".

2. As the CPIO had not provided the requested information, the appellant filed the first appeal dated 10.09.2018 requesting that the information should be provided to him. The response of FAA is not on record. He filed a second appeal u/Section 19(3) of the RTI Act before the Commission on the ground that information has not been provided to him and requested the Commission to direct the respondent to provide complete and correct information.

Hearing:

3. The appellant and the respondent could not participate in the hearing.

4. The appellant submitted his written submissions dated 17.07.2020 and the same has been taken on record.

5. The appellant vide his written submissions had informed the Commission that he has received requisite information from the respondent public authority and now he wishes to withdraw this present second appeal.

Decision:

6. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed as "withdrawn".

Page 2 of 3

7. Copy of the decision be provided free of cost to the parties.




                                                            नीरज कुमार गु ता)
                                        Neeraj Kumar Gupta (नीरज          ता
                                                                सूचना आयु त)
                                      Information Commissioner (स         त

                                                      दनांक / Date    20.07.2020


Authenticated true copy
(अिभ मािणत स$ािपत ित)


S. C. Sharma (एस. सी. शमा),
Dy. Registrar (उप-पंजीयक),
(011-26105682)




Addresses of the parties:
1.    The CPIO,
      M/o Chemicals & Fertilizer,

National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, NIPER, Sector -67, S.A.S, Nagar, (Mohali), Punjab-160062.

2. Kamalpreet Singh, Page 3 of 3