Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Rajan M Shah vs Madhya Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd on 7 May, 2013

Author: S.G.Shah

Bench: S.G.Shah

  
	 
	 RAJAN M SHAH....Petitioner(s)V/SMADHYA GUJARAT VIJ CO. LTD. NOTICE TO BE SERVED UPON....Respondent(s)
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	C/SCA/6300/2004
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


SPECIAL CIVIL
APPLICATION  NO. 6300 of 2004
 

===========================================================
 


RAJAN M
SHAH....Petitioner(s)
 


Versus
 


MADHYA GUJARAT VIJ CO. LTD.
NOTICE TO BE SERVED UPON....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
PARTHIV B SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
 

MS
LILU K BHAYA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 

RULE
SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE S.G.SHAH
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 07/05/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

Learned advocate Mr. Parthiv B. Shah, appearing for the petitioner, has pressed either to decide the matter right now or to keep it with the Letters Patent Appeal No. 618 of 2013 which is filed against the judgment and order dated 31st January 2013, which is passed in the Special Civil Application No. 6164 of 2004, since learned advocate Mr. Parthiv B. Shah has relied upon such judgment of the Hon'ble Single Judge. Whereas learned advocate Ms. Lilu K. Bhaya, appearing for the respondent, has fairly stated that as the judgment and order dated 31st January 2013 in Special Civil Application No. 6164 of 2004 is under challenge in Letters Patent Appeal No. 618 of 2013, so it would be appropriate to wait for some time.

In view of the above fact matter is adjourned. List this matter after four weeks.

(S.G.SHAH, J.) Deepak Page 2 of 2