Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd. vs The State Of Tamilnadu . on 1 September, 2014

Bench: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, Prafulla Chandra Pant

  ITEM NO.202                                COURT NO.5              SECTION XII

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

  Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                  No(s).   20066/2008

  (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/03/2008
  in WA No. 1178/2005 passed by the High Court Of Madras)

  GOLD QUEST INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                   VERSUS

  THE STATE OF TAMILNADU AND ORS.                    Respondent(s)
  (With appln. (s) for intervention and interim relief and office
  report)

  Date : 01/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.

  CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA CHANDRA PANT

  For Petitioner(s)
                                        Mr.    Altaf Ahmed, Sr. Adv.
                                        Mr.    V. G. Pragasam,Adv.
                                        Mr.    S.J. Aristotle, Adv.
                                        Mr.    Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv.

  For Respondent(s)
                                        Mr.    Subramonium Prasad, AAG
                                        Mr.    B. Balaji,Adv.
                                        Mr.    R. Rakesh Sharma, Adv.
                                        Mr.    Rajeev Dalal, Adv.
                                        Ms.    Neha Agarwal, Adv.
                                        Mr.    Dharmendra Kumar Sinha,Adv.

                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R

Heard.

Learned counsel for the parties.

Arguments concluded.

Judgment reserved.

(Neeta) (Usha Sharma) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER