Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Lal Bahadur vs Railway Electrification on 2 September, 2022

                                                             1

     ITEM NO.35                         REGISTRAR COURT. 2                 SECTION XI

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


                                      BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER

     IA 119398/2019,119399/2019,119402/2019, in SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION
     (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 26075/2019

     LAL BAHADUR & ORS.                                                          Petitioner(s)

                                                            VERSUS

     RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION & ORS.                                              Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.119399/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY
     IN FILING and IA No.119402/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA
     No.119401/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
      IA No. 119399/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
      IA No. 119402/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
      IA No. 119398/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))

     Date : 02-09-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.



     For Petitioner(s)                    Mr. Yasharth Kant,Adv.
                                          Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, AOR

     For Respondent(s)                    Mr. B.P. Yadav, Adv.
                                          Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR


               UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the
     Court made the following
                                  O R D E R

Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have already filed the counter affidavit.

Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 3 and 7 to 10 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2022.09.03 11:31:49 IST Reason:

Ld. Counsel for petitioners has neither filed application for substituted service for effecting service upon Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 nor taken fresh steps.

2

Ld. Counsel for petitioners submits that before filing application for substituted service, service of notice be effected once more through concerned District Court. Upon steps being taken by petitioners in this regard within a period of two weeks, notice be issued through concerned District Court.

List again on 17.10.2022.

S.P.S. LALER Registrar MG