Karnataka High Court
Mr S B Ibrahim vs Walter D Souza(Major) on 5 October, 2009
Author: N.Ananda
Bench: N.Ananda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER 20GB
BEFORE V T" 3
THE HON'I3LE MR. .IUS'£'1CEN. V'
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.g?7B:1/2008' ;, 7
BETWEEN:
I. MR. S. B. IBBAIIIMS/O. VSAIAIEEABBA,
AGED ABOUT SOVYEPRS', A
R/OAJJINADKA, - '
MULLAGUDDE, A
KOTEKAR
. = ...APPELLANT
(By Sri . D:II'Af;}VOCATE)
AND _ _ I _ V
I. WAETER D*SOU:?A.--~
S/O."E_'NNvESI-_IIQ.US«USOUZA,
AGE: IvIA,L_IOE.,.=R/;A'r"NADEI<AL HOUSE.
.. QASAIGOLI 'POST, U
MA' 3-NJAI\IADY VILLAGE,
" NA*EIQ.NAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,
" --._~1S'£' «E;I,OG'R, EMJAYAS COMPLEX,
OPP. NE.'mRAvATHI BUILDING,
MANGALORE; '
REF BY ITS MANAGER.
RESPONDENTS
TO R-1 SERVED 8: M/S. LEXPLEXUS FOR R2 ) THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND AWARD DATED 09.06.2008 PASSED IN MVC NO.18'79/2006 ON.A.fI'I€1:EAf"I_=*1£;E OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, DAKSHINA§--.KANNjADA, I. > MANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING "THE CLAIA/I:'~.SPEfrIT1ON' FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING'::L::\:IIANC1é§«I~I«;NfI""'OF'. COMPENSATION. " ' ' "
THIS APPEAL COMINO O'£"~l:F"IOR THIS V' DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED-'THE"FGLI2C)W'I1'JG:,7 cOmper__1Sa._ti0n.V , V_ hav.ev'v--heaTd~~--":Sri Krishnamoorthy. 13., learned ' _ C(f}Il':_1__1-"1:'S€;p'1.L:fO17."Claifrififit-~£'1Ild Sri D. Devayya, learned counsel for L j;nsuV:a:1gé Company. per medical evidence, Claimant had Suffered R fO11OwiI1g injuriesr _ 8fl___e[/J, A Laeerated wound of temporal region;
Abrasion over chin; Abrasion over left knee joint; CT. scan ventricular right showed. « 5_i11trai -- I, "
hemorrhag_e,fj» Isub'~'=_ ' archnoid hemorrhage'. and _ " it injury of the.=he__ad is'.grievous"in.V nature.
4. The Tribunal _a'l1as_Vf':'aWard?edVA 'eornpensation of Rs. 1 ,s7,500/-'V under rq:1¢{:vi;~;g laeads;-- V 1 "
ii} "
{iii}
(iv) " ~._ 'lit.\wl--ards_ pain, .
ga_uffe'ring"a'nd"shock:
T o'§va1'ds ~rr1edie.al expenses ' .To12{fardse_l'oss' of amenities _ and'enjoy;ment of life " owards the disability Towards travelling expenses, food and ' nourishment t diva Towards future medical charges Rs.40,000/--
Rs.52,200/-
Rs.20,000/~ Rs.20.000/»-
Rs. 15,000/~ Rs.20,000/~ TOTAL Rs.1,67,500/~ N 'L'
5. The claimant hag: made unsuccessful attempt to establish that he has been completely K accident and he has not been able to do any wor'k.__.:' PW--2, Dr.Divakar Rao, has admittedmth'at after, claimant would be able to do cool$7'._v\}o_r_l{. Tribunal has rightly rejected'--._fldei» claim. . of it earning and loss offut1irs.ea171ings;. it
6. The Tribunal... compensation towards loss Considering the nature and income of the claimantiua -iisvawarded towards loss of eamingyyldiiringl Thus, claimant is entitled to total compensation of Rs. l"',$7'9,500/--. '7': in *the.:esult, I pass the following:--
O R I) E R ("if The Appeal is accepted.
(ii) The impugned award is modified;
?\r'. c:,..§-i ---~«-8«-'-"'5é"' :
[iii] (V) Compensation of Rs.1,67,500/-
awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced to Rs.l,79,500/~ withw interest at the rate of 6% p,ai--. from the date of petition date of realisation;
The apportiorznient, giaynient . investment shailfbe in the "ra_i;io evolved the Vimptigned aWai'd~.-.. Parties are todV"b_'eaf'_'_their _ Costs.