Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Amitbhai Bhupatrai Desai vs Charmiben Amitbhai Desai & 3 on 3 February, 2015

Author: S.G.Shah

Bench: S.G.Shah

          R/CR.MA/2412/2015                                       ORDER




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

      CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 2412 of 2015

          In CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 497 of 2014

================================================================
                AMITBHAI BHUPATRAI DESAI....Applicant(s)
                              Versus
             CHARMIBEN AMITBHAI DESAI & 3....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR RAJESH K SAVJANI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS JD JHAVERI, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 4
================================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.SHAH

                               Date : 03/02/2015


                                 ORAL ORDER

[1] Heard Mr. Rajesh K. Savjani, learned advocate for the  applicant.   It   is   submitted   that   though   impugned   order   granting  interim   injunction   has   been   challenged   by   filing   Criminal   Misc.  Application No.497 of 2014 but since there was some delay and,  therefore,   Criminal   Misc.   Application   being   No.1695   of   2015   is  preferred   and   though   this   Court   has   issued   notice;   on  condition  that petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs.15,000/­, making it  returnable   on   25.2.2015, at  present, it  seems that  Family Court,  Rajkot   has   issued   warrant   of   arrest   of   the   present   applicant   -  husband. It is further submitted that if at all husband is arrested for  non­payment of interim maintenance, which is under challenge in  main Revision Application, then certainly wife would not be able to  Page 1 of 3 R/CR.MA/2412/2015 ORDER get any amount of maintenance and, therefore, when husband is  ready and willing to abide by the Court's order to pay reasonable  maintenance   subject   to   its   confirmation   after  adjudication   of   his  Revision Application, there is no question of his arrest and keeping  him in custody for non­payment of amount of maintenance.

[2] Learned   advocate   Mr.   Savjani   for   the   applicant   has  already   shown   Demand   Draft   No.986799   dated   3.2.2015   for  Rs.15,000/­ in favour of Registrar General, High Court of Gujarat in  compliance of order dated 29.1.2015 in Criminal Misc. Application  No.1695 of 2015.

[3] In   view   of   above   facts,   circumstances   and   disclosure,  the warrant dated 15.10.20014 issued by the Family Court, Rajkot  in Criminal Misc. Application No.590 of 2013 is stayed. Thereby,  the concerned police authority should not arrest the applicant till  the   next   date   of   hearing   but   on   condition   that   applicant   shall  deposit   Rs.40,000/­   on   or   before   returnable   date   i.e.  27.2.2015  and shall continue to deposit Rs.25,000/­ per month thereafter. It is  made clear that above amount is to be deposited before this Court  and shall be disbursed by this Court only after other side appears  before this Court. 

[4] Applicant   is   apprehending   disturbance   on   date   of  hearing   before   the   Family   Court,   Rajkot   considering   his   past  experience which is pleaded in the petition. In view of such fact,  the   YADI   be   forwarded   to   the   Family   Court,   Rajkot   to   do   the  needful   to   provide   proper   protection   to   the   applicant   herein   on  Page 2 of 3 R/CR.MA/2412/2015 ORDER every date of hearing. For the purpose, Family Court, Rajkot shall  forward a YADI to the Commissioner of Police, Rajkot as well as  Rajkot   Local   Police,   Rajkot   to   do   the   needful   to   extend   proper  protection to the applicant - husband on every date of hearing.

[4] YADI   of   this   order   to   be   forwarded   to   the   Police  Commissioner, Mumbai by today itself.

[5]           Direct Service, today, is permitted.  



                                                                 (S.G.SHAH, J.)
VATSAL




                                    Page 3 of 3