Karnataka High Court
Smt. Pilla Akkayyamma W/O Late Byrappa vs Channappa Dead By Lrs Smt Akkayamma on 5 January, 2015
Author: Ravi Malimath
Bench: Ravi Malimath
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1015 OF 2011(DEC)
BETWEEN:
1. Smt.Pilla Akkayyamma
W/o late Byrappa
D/o late Byrappa,
Aged about 63 years,
R/o Avathi Village, Kasaba Hobli,
Devanahalli Taluk,
Bengaluru Rural District - 562 110.
2. Smt.Rangalakshmamma
W/o Sriramappa
D/o late Byrappa,
Aged about 53 years,
R/o Ittasandra Village,
Nandagudi Hobli,
Hosakote Taluk,
Bengaluru Rural District - 562 114.
2
3. Rangappa
S/o late Byrappa
Aged about 56 years
R/o Haliyuru Village,
Vijayapura Hobli,
Devanahalli Taluk,
Bengaluru Rural District - 562 110.
...APPELLANTS
(By Sri Rajanna, Advocate-absent)
AND:
1. Channappa, dead by LRs
1(a) Smt.Akkayamma
W/o late Channappa
Aged about 43 years
1(b) Muniraja
S/o late Channappa
Aged about 43 years
1(c) Smt.Manjulamma
D/o late Channappa
Aged about 33 years
1(d) Lakshmamma
D/o late Channappa
Aged about 31 years
All the above are
R/o Avathi Village,
Kasaba Hobli,
3
Devanahalli Taluk,
Bengaluru Rural District - 562 110.
1(e) Smt.Munithayamma
D/o late Channappa
Aged about 43 years
R/o Chokkanahalli Village,
Jangamakote Hobli,
Siddlaghatta Taluk,
Chikkaballapur District - 562 101.
2. Ramanjinappa
S/o late Channappa
Aged about 38 years
R/o Avathi Village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Devanahalli Taluk,
Bengaluru Rural District - 562 110.
...RESPONDENTS
(By Sri M.S.Varadarajan, Advocate for C/R)
*****
This RSA is filed under Section 100 of CPC
against the judgment and decree dated 11.1.2011
passed in R.A.No.110/2008 on the file of the Presiding
Officer, Fast Track Court, Devanahalli, dismissing the
appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated
24.10.2008 passed in O.S.No.402/1996 on the file of
the Addl.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) & JMFC, Devanahalli.
4
This RSA coming on for hearing this day, the
court delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellants even though the matter was called on two occasions. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE Rsk/-