Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Narsingh Goyal @ Monu Son Of Haridas vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:19826) on 12 May, 2025

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

                                   [2025:RJ-JP:19826]

                                           HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                                                       BENCH AT JAIPUR

                                           S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2072/2025
                                   1.          Narsingh Goyal @ Monu Son Of Haridas, Aged About 31
                                               Years, Resident Of 38, Fej First Ector 31B Imt, Rohtak
                                               Haryana, Operator Super Gas Plant, Shiv Energy Pvt. Lt.d
                                               And.
                                   2.          Smt. Radha @ Rasida Wife Of Yogesh Kumar Choudhary,
                                               Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Dharsoni, Tehsil Vair,
                                               Bharatpur, Raj.
                                                                                                        ----Petitioners
                                                                         Versus
                                   State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
                                                                                                       ----Respondent


                                   For Petitioner(s)             :   Mr. Avtar Singh for
                                                                     Mr. Rajveer Singh
                                   For Respondent(s)             :   Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with
                                                                     Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP



                                                      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

                                                                      Judgment

                                   12/05/2025

                                         After arguing for while, learned counsel for the petitioners

wants to withdraw the present petition.

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Howsoever, it is clarified that no prejudice will be caused to the petitioners on account of said withdrawal in the proceedings before the learned Trial Court.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/28 (Downloaded on 15/05/2025 at 09:58:38 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)