Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Badaru Nisha @ Badarun Nisha vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 25 October, 2018

Author: Prabhat Kumar Jha

Bench: Prabhat Kumar Jha

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18233 of 2017
     ======================================================
     Badaru Nisha @ Badarun Nisha, wife of Late Md. Kasim, resident of Village
     and P.O. Siura, P.S. Patori, District Samastipur.

                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms,
     Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Members Administrative, Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna.
3.   The Collector, Samastipur.
4.   The Anchal Adhikari, Patori Anchal, P.O and P.S. Patori, District Samastipur.
5.   Md. Sahabuddin son of Abdul Zabbar, resident of Village- Hazrat Siura, P.S.
     Patori, District Samastipur.

                                               ... ... Respondents
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Ramesh Kumar Choudhary
     For the Respondent/s   :        Mr. Raj Kishore Roy-Gp18
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA
     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 25-10-2018


                 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

     learned counsel for the State.

                 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition for quashing

     the order dated 07.09.2017, passed by Member Administrative,

     Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.L.T. Case No.1195 of 2015,

     Annexure-5, whereby the Member Administrative, Bihar Land

     Tribunal set aside the order dated 01.07.2015, passed by the

     Collector, Samastipur in Basgit Parcha Case No.48 of 2007 as well

     as the order dated 18.10.2006, passed by the Anchaladhikari,

     Patori in Basgit Parcha Case No.05 of 2006-07.
 Patna High Court CWJC No.18233 of 2017 dt.25-10-2018
                                           2/3




                    3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

       petitioner filed a petition before the Circle Officer for issuance of

       Basgit Parcha with regard to the land of Khata No.477, Khesra

       No.2067, area 16 Dhurs standing in the name of Md. Israil and

       Md. Ismail Wazmul. The Circle Officer after holding the inquiry

       ordered for issuance of Basgit Parcha in favour of the petitioner

       but the respondent no.5, Md. Sahabuddin filed appeal before the

       Collector and assailed the order that Rule 5 of the Bihar Privileged

       Persons Homestead Tenancy Act was violated, no inquiry was held

       by the Circle Inspector. The Rule mandates that the inquiry shall

       be held by an officer not below the rank of Circle Inspector. The

       Collector dismissed the appeal of the respondent no.5. Thereafter

       the respondent no.5 filed case before the Bihar Land Tribunal and

       the Member Administrative, Bihar Land Tribunal illegally held

       that Basgit Parcha was illegally issued in favour of the petitioner

       without following the procedure of law and without giving notice

       to the landlord. It is further submitted that the respondent no.5 has

       already filed suit for setting aside the Parcha issued in favour of

       the petitioner but on perusal of the records and after considering

       the submissions of the petitioner, I find that the learned Member

       Administrative, Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna has categorically held

       that Rule 5 of the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy
              Patna High Court CWJC No.18233 of 2017 dt.25-10-2018
                                                        3/3




                    Act has not been followed. The Circle Officer entrusted the inquiry

                    to the Halka Karamchari and no notice was served on the landlord.

                    In this view of the fact, I find no illegality in the order dated

                    07.09.2017

, passed by Member Administrative, Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.L.T. Case No.1195 of 2015.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed being devoid of any merit.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) S.KUMAR/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          29.10.2018
Transmission Date       NA