Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Shrikant Patel vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 March, 2022

Author: Vivek Agarwal

Bench: Vivek Agarwal

                                                                   1
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT JABALPUR
                                                            BEFORE
                                              HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
                                                       ON THE 29th OF MARCH, 2022

                                                WRIT PETITION No. 6971 of 2022

                                 Between:-
                                 SHRIKANT PATEL S/O RAMAVATAR PATEL , AGED
                                 ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PANCHAYAT
                                 SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT BARHA TOLA,
                                 TEHSIL BEOHARI DISTT. SHAHDOL (MADHYA
                                 PRADESH)

                                                                                                 .....PETITIONER
                                 (BY SHRI SUDHANSHU KUMAR SINGH, ADVOCATE )

                                 AND

                      1.         THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE
                                 PRINCIPAL   SECRETARY PANCHAYAT    AND
                                 GRAMIN VIKAS VIBHAG VALLABH BHAWAN,
                                 BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                      2.         DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT RAJ
                                 VI B HAAG DIRECTORATE ARERA HILLS, M.P.
                                 BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                      3.         THE COLLECTOR SHAHDOL DISTT. SHAHDOL M.P.
                                 (MADHYA PRADESH)

                      4.         ZILA PANCHAYAT THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
                                 O F F I C E R DISTT. SHAHDOL (M.P.) (MADHYA
                                 PRADESH)

                      5.         JANPAD      PANCHAYAT THROUGH     CHIEF
                                 EXECUTIVE   OFFICER DISTT. SHAHDOL M.P.
                                 (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                              .....RESPONDENTS
                                 (BY SHRI JITENDRA SHRIVASTAVA, PL FOR STATE)

                              T h is petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the
                      following:
                                                                    ORDER

Shri Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Jitendra Shviastava, learned PL for the respondent/State.

Petitioner is aggrieved of order dated 22/12/2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Chief Executive officer, Zila Panchayat Shahdol, whereby petitioner whose name appears at Serial No. 6, who was Signature SAN Not Verified working as Panchayat Secretary is transferred from Gram Panchayat Barhotola to Gram Panchayat Digitally signed by TARUN KUMAR Bholahara, District Shahdol.

SALUNKE Date: 2022.03.30 16:29:05 IST 2

It is submitted that Shehmani Singh Barghi has been transferred from Bholahara to Barhatola and elections have been postponed.

It is submitted that Division Bench of this Court in W.A No. 64/2022 (Tulsiram Patel Vs. State of M.P & others) decided on 28/01/2022 has held that since elections have been cancelled, therefore, there is no justification in implementing the said directives of election commission and has quashed the order of transfer.

It is submitted that petitioner specifically have taken a ground in para 6.3 of the writ petition that he is still posted at Gram Panchayat Barhotola and has not been relieved and no body joined in his place.Subject to such declaration, it is directed that if petitioner is still posted at Gram Panchayat Barhotola, not being relieved, nobody joined in his place of the petitioner as on today then the impugned order of transfer will not be given effect to in terms of the directions of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A No. 64/2022 (Tulsiram Patel Vs. State of M.P & others) decided on 28/01/2022.

It is made clear that in case petitioner is relieved or any person has reported for joining in his place, then this order will not be given effect.

In above terms this petition is disposed of.

(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE tarun