Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

M/S Goel Trading Company vs Devendra Kumar Jain And 4 Ors on 17 June, 2022

Author: Hitesh Kumar Sarma

Bench: Hitesh Kumar Sarma

                                                                 Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010080152022




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : CRP/47/2022

         M/S GOEL TRADING COMPANY
         A REGISTERED COMPANY BEING REPRESENTED BY SRI RAVINDRA
         KUMAR JAIN, S/O LATE CHATURSAN JAIN, PARTNER OF M/S GOEL
         TRADING COMPANY AT VILL-BALIPARA, MOUZA- BALIPARA, P.O.-
         BALIPARA, P.S.-CHARIDUAR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM


         VERSUS

         DEVENDRA KUMAR JAIN AND 4 ORS
         S/O NOT KNOWN, 145 AIKEN ROAD, WEST PENNAT HILLS, NSW 2125,
         AUSTRALIA

         2:INDIAN OIL COPRORATION LIMITED
          INDIAN OIL BHAWAN
          SECTOR III
          NOONMATI
          GUWAHATI-781020 (ASSAM)

         3:THE CHIEF DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER
          GUWAHATI INTEGRATED DIVISIONAL OFFICE
          SECTOR 3
          NOONMATI
          GUWAHATI-781020

         4:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER
          INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED
          NOONMATI
          GUWAHATI-781020

         5:THE AREA MARKETING OFFICER
         TEZPUR RETAIL SALE-I
          IN FRONT OF TEZPUR LAW COLLEGE
         TEZPUR
                                                                         Page No.# 2/2

             MOUZA-MAHABHAIRAB
             P.O. AND P.S.-TEZPUR
             DIST-SONITPUR
             ASSAM
             PIN

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. S SAHU

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. ABU JAHID (R2-R5)




                                     BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA

                                         ORDER

Date : 17-06-2022 The petitioner is represented by Mr. S Sahu, learned counsel. The respondent No. 1 is represented by Mr. K Rahman, learned counsel and the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are represented by Mr. A Jahid, learned counsel.

List the matter for admission hearing in the 3rd week after the ensuing summer vacation.

Interim order passed earlier, if any, stands extended till next listing of the case, as directed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant