Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Gujarat High Court

Lamifab Industries & vs Union Of India & on 9 January, 2013

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi

  
	 
	 LAMIFAB INDUSTRIESV/SUNION OF INDIA
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	C/SCA/10114/2012
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION 
NO. 10114 of 2012
 

================================================================
 


LAMIFAB INDUSTRIES  & 
1....Petitioner(s)
 


Versus
 


UNION OF INDIA  & 
2....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
PARESH M DAVE, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 - 2
 

MR
PS CHAMPANERI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 

MR
RJ OZA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 3
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

and
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE MS
				JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI
			
		
	

 


 Date : 09/01/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Rule.

On the condition that the petitioners deposit with the Excise department, even if under protest, entire principal sum of Rs.12,84,023/-, the respondents shall grant the petitioners request for inclusion of plot no.4705 of GIDC, Plastic Zone, Sarigam, subject to fulfillment of other procedure. It is clarified that the department however, shall not be entitled to raise objection of non payment of full amount of excise dues or that the registration of the previous owner was not cancelled. Deposit by the petitioners and other entire arrangement is subject to outcome of the petition.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) raghu Page 2 of 2