Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 9] [Entire Act]

State of Madhya Pradesh - Section

Section 441B in The M.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956

441B. Grounds for declaring elections or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] to be void.

(1)Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), if the Court is of the opinion-
(a)that on the dale of his election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] a returned candidate was not qualified or was disqualified, to be chosen as a [Mayor or a Councillor] [Inserted by M P. Act No. 18 of 1997.]; or
(b)that any corrupt practice has been committed by a returned candidate or his agent or by any other person with the consent of a returned candidate or his agent; or
(c)that any nomination paper has been improperly rejected; or
(d)that the result of the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.], in so far as it concerns a returned candidate has been materially affected-
(i)by the improper acceptance of any [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.]; or
(ii)by a corrupt practice having been committed in the interest of the returned candidate by a person other than that candidate or his agent or a person acting with the consent of such candidate or agent; or
(iii)by the improper acceptance or refusal of any vote or reception of any vote which is void; or
(iv)by the non-compliance with the provisions of this Act or of any rules or orders made thereunder save the rules framed under [Section 14] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 18 of 1997.] in so far as they relate to preparation and revision of list of voters.
the Court shall declare the election of the returned candidate to be void.
(2)If in the opinion of the Court a returned candidate has been guilty by an agent of any corrupt practice, but the Court is satisfied-
(a)that no such corrupt practice was committed at the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] by the candidate, and every such corrupt practice was committed contrary to the instructions, and without the consent of the candidate;
(b)that the candidate took all reasonable means for preventing the commission of corrupt practices at the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.]: and
(c)that in all other respects the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] was free from any corrupt practice on the part of the candidate or any of his agents.
then, the Court may decide that the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] of the returned, candidate is not void.