Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

M/S. K.N.Sathyapalan And Company vs The Superintending Engineer on 27 October, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI

                 FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2014/13TH POUSHA, 1935

                                  WP(C).No. 35569 of 2009 (M)
                                      ----------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------

            M/S. K.N.SATHYAPALAN AND COMPANY,
            ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR, REPRESENTED BY
            MANAGING PARTNER S.SATHEESH, S/O. K.N.SATHYAPALAN, AGED 36
            CHARUVILA PUTHENVEEDU, EDAKKIDAM.P.O., EZHUKONE
            KOLLAM.

            BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL

RESPONDENT:-
----------------------

            THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PWD ROADS
            AND BRIDGES SOUTH CIRCLE, TRIVANDRUM.

             BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.V.ELIYAS

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
             ON 03-01-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
             FOLLOWING:-




KKS

WP(C).No. 35569 of 2009 (G)
-----------------------------------

                                              APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:-
-------------------------------------

          EXHIBIT P1(a) :- TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A
                                  REGULAR CUM BRIDGE ACROSS CHALIYAR RIVER AT
                                  KAVANKKALLU IN MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

          EXHIBIT P1(b) :- TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE FOR THE WORK OF
                                  CONSTRUCTION OF AREGULAR CUM BRIDGE AT
                                  KAVANAKKALLU ACROSS CHALIYAR RIVER IN
                                  MALAPPURAM.

          EXHIBIT P1(c) :- TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE FOR WORK OF
                                  CONSTRUCTION OF ACHECK DAM CUM BRIDGE ACROSS
                                  KARAMANA RIVER AT KOVILKADAVU IN ARUVIKKARA
                                  PANCHAYATH.

           EXHIBIT P1(e) :- TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE FOR THE WORK " KIP-
                                  DAM AT PARAPPAR-CONSTRUCTION OF AN AUXILIARY
                                  SPILLWAY,STILLING BASIN, LEADING CHANNEL, BRIDGES
                                  AND EXTENSION OF THE LEFT SIDE TRAINING WALL FROM
                                  CH.135 M TO 435M.

          EXHIBIT P2 :-          TRUE COPY OF 'A' CLASS REGISTRATION VALID
                                  UPTO 31.3.2011.

          EXHIBIT P3 :-          TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 27.10.2009 ISSUED
                                  BY THE RESPONDENT.

          EXHIBIT P4 :-           TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE FOR THE WORK OF
                                  CONSTRUCTION OF ABRIDGE CUM REGULAR AT
                                   MANJUMAL ACROSS PERIYAR RIVER.

          EXHIBIT P5 :-            TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONER
                                   BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 5.12.2009.


RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:-                   NIL
--------------------------------------


                                       //TRUE COPY//

                                                                     P.S.TO JUDGE




KKS



            A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
        --------------------------------------------------
               W.P.(C) No. 35569 of 2009
        --------------------------------------------------
       Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2014




                      J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, which is a partnership concern, applied for the bid document on 05.12.2009 in response to a pre-qualification notification issued by the respondent in relation to the work of construction of a bridge at Maruthankuzhy. According to the petitioner, though he satisfied the entire requirements under Ext.P3, without any reason, the tender documents are not issued to the petitioner for the submission of the tender on 11.12.2009.

2. By interim order dated 09.12.2009, this Court directed the respondent to issue tender documents in respect of the work described in Ext.P3 to the petitioner forthwith in order to enable him to submit the tender before 4.00 pm on 11.12.2009.

W.P.(C) No. 35569 of 2009

..2..

As the purpose sought to be achieved by the filing of this writ petition is served by the interim order dated 09.12.2009, this writ petition is closed without examining the merits of the grounds raised.

Sd/-

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE bka/-