Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 26]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Piara Singh vs Satpal Banga & Another on 3 August, 2011

Author: Ajai Lamba

Bench: Ajai Lamba

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA,
                     CHANDIGARH


              Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-36255 of 2010 (O &
                                                              M)
                               Date of Decision: August 03, 2011



Piara Singh
                                              .....PETITIONER(S)

                            VERSUS


Satpal Banga & another
                                           .....RESPONDENT(S)

                           .    .    .


CORAM:            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA


PRESENT: -        Mr. Sanjeev Pandit, Advocate, for the
                  petitioner.

                  None for respondent No.1.

                  Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate
                  General, Punjab, for respondent No.2.



                           .    .     .


AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)

1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing order dated 12.6.2010 passed in Complaint No.36 of 9.8.2007, under Sections 323, 506, 379, 411 IPC.

2. It appears that the petitioner was declared proclaimed offender, and therefore, proceedings were being Crl. Misc. No. M-36255 of 2010 [2] delayed. Vide Order dated 10.12.2010, the petitioner was directed to be released on interim bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has informed the Court that petitioner appeared before the Trial Court and has been released on bail. Thereafter, the petitioner has been appearing before the Trial Court. Learned counsel has further assured the Court that here-in-after, the petitioner shall not cause any delay in proceedings and shall appear on each and every date as required by law.

4. In view of the above, bail granted to the petitioner is confirmed.

5. Petition is disposed of accordingly.


                                                         (AJAI LAMBA)
August 03, 2011                                             JUDGE
avin




1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?