Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 7]

Gujarat High Court

Sureshbhai Pratapbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 30 January, 2015

Author: A.J.Desai

Bench: A.J.Desai

     R/CR.MA/1388/2015                                                                                                                                ORDER




  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 1388 of 2015

================================================================
                          SURESHBHAI PRATAPBHAI PATEL....Applicant(s)
                                          Versus
                              STATE OF GUJARAT....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR P P MAJMUDAR, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR LB DABHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================

                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI

                                                            Date : 30/01/2015


                                                                ORAL ORDER

1. By   way   of   the   present   successive   bail   application   filed   under  Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, the applicant  has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with F.I.R.  registered at C.R. No. I - 112 Of 2014 with  Chikhli Police Station,  District Navsari.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that considering the  nature of offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail  by imposing suitable conditions.

3. The learned APP opposes the grant of bail looking to the nature  and gravity of offences.

4. Learned   advocate   appearing   for   the   respective   parties   do   not  invite a reasoned order.

Page  1 of  3

R/CR.MA/1388/2015                                                                                                                                ORDER

5.  I   have   heard   learned   advocates   appearing   for   the   parties. 

Considering the fact that charge sheet is filed and the allegation  levelled against the present applicant, I am of the opinion that this  is a fit case to exercise the discretion to enlarge the applicant on  bail.   Hence,   the   application   is   allowed   and   the   applicant   is  ordered to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No. I - 112  Of 2014 with  Chikhli Police Station, District Navsari on executing  a   bond   of  Rs.10,000/­(Rupees   Ten   Thousand   only)  with   one  surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and  subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b]  not   act   in   a   manner   injuries   to   the   interest   of   the  prosecution;

[c]  surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d]  not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of  the Sessions Judge concerned;

[e]  mark presence at the concerned police station on any day of  first weeks of each English Calender Month for a period of  six months;

[f]  furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also  to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall  not change the residence without prior permission of this  Court;

6.  The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required  in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach  of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge  concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action  in  the  matter. Bail  bond to be  executed before the  lower  court  having   jurisdiction   to   try   the   case.   It   will   be   open   for   the  Page  2 of  3 R/CR.MA/1388/2015                                                                                                                                ORDER concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above  conditions in accordance with law. At the trial, the trial court shall  not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua  the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the  applicant on bail.

7.  Rule   made   absolute   to   the   aforesaid   extent.   Direct   service   is  permitted.

(A.J.DESAI, J.)  *Kazi...

Page  3 of  3