Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 3]

Chattisgarh High Court

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Vikky @ Vikas Kediya on 20 January, 2016

Bench: Chief Justice, P. Sam Koshy

                                        1



                                                                         NAFR
           HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                             Cr.M.P No. 41 of 2016
        State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police
        Station Khamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.
                                                                  ---- Petitioner
                                     Versus
     1. Vikky @ Vikas Kediya S/o Basant Kediya Aged About 28 Years
        Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Ward No. 13, Khamhariya, Police Station
        Khamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.
     2. Monu @ Amit Kediya S/o Goutam Kediya Aged About 25 Years
        Occupation Shopkeeper, R/o Ward No. 13, Khamhariya, Police Station
        Khamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.
     3. Goutam Kediya S/o Baldev Kediya Aged About 50 Years Occupation
        Cloth Merchant, R/o Ward No. 13, Khamhariya, Police Station
        Khamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.
                                                             ------Respondents

For Appellant/State: Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Deputy Advocate General.

For Respondent: None.

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Judgment on Board Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice 20/1/2016

1. The present appeal assails acquittal of the Respondents dated 29.9.2015 of the charge under Section 307 IPC by the Sessions Judge, Bemetara in Sessions Trial No.41/2012.

2. Learned Counsel for the State submits that due to the assault by a sharp weapon, one of the eyes of the victim was permanently damaged.

3. We are not satisfied that it will attract the offence under Section 307 IPC when conviction has already been ordered under Section 325/34 IPC.

4. This shall be without prejudice to the rights of the victim in accordance 2 with law.

5. We find not reason to grant leave to appeal.

6. The application is dismissed.

                         Sd/-                                       Sd/-
                     (Navin Sinha)                            (P. Sam Koshy)
                    CHIEF JUSTICE                                JUDGE

Priya