Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Uttarakhand High Court

Dr. Shalabh Gupta vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 22 February, 2016

Author: V.K. Bist

Bench: K.M. Joseph, V.K. Bist

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

              Writ Petition (S/B) No.340 of 2015


Dr. Charu Chandra Dhondiyal.                                  .....Petitioner
                    Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others.                            .......Respondents

                                        with

              Writ Petition (S/B) No.350 of 2015

Dr. Tirath Prakash.                                           .....Petitioner
                    Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others.                            .......Respondents

                                        with

              Writ Petition (S/B) No.351 of 2015

Dr. Chandrapal Singh.                                         .....Petitioner
                    Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others.                            .......Respondents

                                        with

              Writ Petition (S/B) No.356 of 2015

Dr. Mohamad Abdul Aleem Ansari.                               .....Petitioner
                    Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others.                            .......Respondents

                                        with

              Writ Petition (S/B) No.355 of 2015

Dr. Shalabh Gupta.                                            .....Petitioner
                    Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others.                            .......Respondents

Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.


                                Dated: February 22, 2016


                Coram: Hon'ble K.M. Joseph, C.J.

Hon'ble V.K. Bist, J.

2

K.M. Jospeh, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no further orders are required, as the petitioners, in all these cases, have been transferred.

2. The writ petitions are closed recording the said submission.

(V.K. Bist, J.) (K.M. Joseph, C.J.) 22.02.2016 Arpan