Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Dhanya Agroindustries Pvt. Ltd vs Kokila Cotton Export Pvt. Ltd on 5 August, 2016

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi

                  O/OJMCA/53/2016                                               ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) NO. 53 of 2016

         ==========================================================
                   DHANYA AGROINDUSTRIES PVT. LTD....Applicant(s)
                                     Versus
                   KOKILA COTTON EXPORT PVT. LTD....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR NARENDRA L JAIN, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI

                                      Date : 05/08/2016


                                        ORAL ORDER

  This application is filed for the purpose of execution  of arbitration  award dated 4.9.2015 as amended by order  dated 15.10.2015 being a foreign award. 

  On 6.5.2016, notice was issued making it returnable  on   17.6.2016.   Though   served   no   one   appeared   for   the  respondent. In terms of sub­rule(1) of   Order XXI Rule 23  of   Code   of   Civil   Procedure,   where   the   person   to   whom  notice is issued under rule 22 does not show cause to the  satisfaction   of   the   Court   why   the   decree   should   not   be  executed, the Court shall order the decree to be executed,  the   Court   shall   order   the   decree   to   be   executed.   In   the  present case, since the respondent  has not appeared and  pointed out why the decree should not be executed, I am of  the opinion that same is required to be executed in terms  Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Tue Aug 09 02:27:42 IST 2016 O/OJMCA/53/2016 ORDER of Order XXI Of the Code of Civil Procedure

  Having   taken   such   measures,   the   stage   would   now  come for issuance of process as provided in  sub­rule(1) of  Order XXI Rule 23. The petitioner has supplied the details  of   an   immovable   property   belonging   to   the   respondent  which are as under :

"KOKILA COTTON EXPORT LTD. "Kokila House" Off C.G. Road, B/h Lal Bungalow, Ahmedabad, (Gujarat)"

  Let such property be attached and process thereof be  issued to respondent, returnable on 2.9.2016. 

  This   order   be   executed   by   the   bailiff   of   City   Civil  Court,  Ahmedabad.  Registry to transmit  this order to the  Registrar, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, for its execution.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) raghu Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Tue Aug 09 02:27:42 IST 2016