Punjab-Haryana High Court
Amrita Bajaj And Another vs Union Of India And Others on 10 February, 2010
Author: Ajay Kumar Mittal
Bench: Ajay Kumar Mittal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 650 of 2010
Date of Decision: 10.2.2010
Amrita Bajaj and another
....Petitioners.
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.
PRESENT: Mr. B.S. Bajwa, Advocate for
Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
The petitioners have approached this Court by way of instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the public notice dated 4.9.2009 (Annexure P-5) whereby the respondents have invited applications for appointment of dealer for existing retail outlet dealership at Shamshdin Chistian Tehsil Jalalabad (West) District Ferozepur ignoring their claim for appointment as a dealer of the said retail outlet.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to make a detailed and comprehensive representation to the respondents for the redressal of their grievances.
In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioners to make a CWP No. 650 of 2010 -2- detailed and comprehensive representation to the respondents for the redressal of their grievance as has been raised in the present writ petition. In case any such representation is made by the petitioners, the same shall be decided by the respondents by passing a speaking order expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of its filing after affording an opportunity of hearing to them.
February 10, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE