Supreme Court - Daily Orders
Damodar Pratapram Jangid vs The State Of Maharashtra on 5 September, 2018
Bench: Navin Sinha, K.M. Joseph
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 604 OF 2016
DAMODAR PRATAPRAM JANGID ... Appellant(s)
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Respondent(s)
O R D E R
The appellantaccused has been convicted under Section
376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) read with Section
506 and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual
Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The sentence of 10 years imposed
by the Trial Court has been reduced to seven years along with
fine, by the High Court.
We have considered the submissions made on behalf of the
parties as also the evidence available on record including
that of the prosecutrix (PW3). The evidence with regard to
her age as minor, has also been duly established by Shri
Rajesh Kamalakar Bakalikar (PW9) from the original school
admission register.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by R
NATARAJAN
The appellantaccused was a tenant in the house of the
Date: 2018.09.07
16:19:01 IST
Reason:
prosecutrix (PW3) at the relevant time. The FIR has been
lodged by the mother of the victim, the next day. The delay,
2
which was emphasized as a ground to urge falsity, has been
duly explained both by PW3 and her father PW2. The
appellantaccused had threatened PW3 to annihilate her and
the entire family if she disclosed the sexual assault made
upon her.
In the entirety of the evidence on record, we find no
reason to interfere. The present appeal is accordingly
dismissed.
......................J.
(NAVIN SINHA)
......................J.
(K.M. JOSEPH)
New Delhi,
Dated: September 5, 2018.
3
ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.10 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Criminal Appeal No(s). 604/2016
DAMODAR PRATAPRAM JANGID Appellant(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)
Date : 05-09-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
For Appellant(s) Mr. Abhijeetam, Adv.
Mr. Rakesh Tiwari, Adv.
Mr. Anant Kumar Sinhad, Adv.
Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR
For Respondent(s) Ms Alka Agrawal, Adv.
Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(MANAV SHARMA) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
(Signed Order is placed on the file)