Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Gnanabaranam vs Ramkumar on 29 March, 2023

Author: R.Suresh Kumar

Bench: R.Suresh Kumar

                                                                              W.A(MD)No.544 of 2013



                    BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED : 29.03.2023

                                                        CORAM :

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
                                          and
                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

                                                W.A(MD)No.544 of 2013
                                                       and
                                                 M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013


                  R.Gnanabaranam                                   .. Appellant


                                                          Vs.

                  1.Ramkumar

                  2.The Assistant Engineer,
                  O&M/TNEB/Nagaram,
                  Kulasekaram,
                  Kanyakumari District.                            .. Respondents


                  PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act,

                  against the order, dated 19.04.2013, made in W.P(MD)No.14292 of

                  2011.

                                      For Appellant     : Mr.K.N.Thampi

                                      For Respondents    : Mr.K.Seemaraj
                                                           for R1

                  ______________
                    Page No. 1 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             W.A(MD)No.544 of 2013



                                                      Mr.S.Deenadhayalan
                                                      Standing Counsel
                                                      for R2


                                                  JUDGMENT

[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This writ appeal has been filed against the order passed by the learned Judge in W.P(MD)No.14292 of 2011 by order dated 19.04.2013.

2. The first respondent in this appeal filed the said writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent, who was Assistant Engineer [O&M] at Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Nagaram, Kulasaekaram, Kanyakumari District to re-shift the electric post to the original places on the western side of the road situated at Resurvey No. 119/A, Thumbacode Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

3. During the pendency of the writ petition, the present appellant as a third party had filed M.P(MD)No.3 of 2012 to get impleaded. However, he was not impleaded but shown as a petitioner in M.P(MD)No.3 of 2012 in the order dated 19.04.2013 whereby, the ______________ Page No. 2 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.544 of 2013 learned Judge given a direction directing the respondent TANGEDCO to find out the place on which the electric pole in question is situate with the assistance of the revenue officials and if it in Survey No.199/9A, the respondent should consider the representation made by the writ petitioner, further, the respondent should also consider the order of injunction passed in original suit in O.S.No.184 of 2011, that was filed by the present appellant.

4. Aggrieved over the said order passed by the learned Judge, the petitioner in M.P(MD)No.3 of 2012 preferred this appeal.

5.Heard the learned counsel respectively appearing for the parties.

6. During the last hearing we wanted the TANGEDCO through his Standing counsel to get instruction as to exactly in which survey number the disputed electric pole is erected and if it is still in existence, what is the proposal of the TANGEDCO to shift it in which survey number. ______________ Page No. 3 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.544 of 2013

7. In response to the said order passed by this Court during last hearing, Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, learned Standing counsel appearing for the second respondent has produced a written instruction that has been given by way of communication by the Tahsildar, Kalkulam to the TANGEDCO where he has stated the following:

“ghh;itapy; tl;lrhh; Ma;thsh;

mwpf;ifapd;go Jk;gnfhL fpuhkk; g[y vz;

119y; tHf;F eilbgWtjhy; g[y vz; 119-6 g[wk;nghf;F nuhL bry;tjhft[k; nkw;go nuhL hPrh;ntgo 2/0kP mfyk; cs;sjhft[k; jw;nghJ g{kpapy; 4/8kPl;lh; tPjpapy; nuhL bry;tjhft[k; Twpa[s;shh;/ 119-6y; bry;Yk; bjd;tly; nuhl;od; fpHf;F gf;fk; kpd;fk;g';fs; elg;gl;Ls;sjhft[k; kpd;fk;g';fs; elg;gl;Ls;s ,lk; 119-9A7D y; tUtjhFk;/ nkw;go g[y vz; 119-9A7D gl;lh epyk; vd;Wk; jdJ mwpf;ifapy; rhh;

Ma;thsh; (epy msth;) Twpa[s;shh; vd;w tpguj;jpid bjhptpf;fg;gLfpwJ/ xk;-

tl;lhl;rpah;

fy;Fsk;/””

8. Relying upon this communication of the Tahsildar concerned, the learned Standing counsel for TANGEDCO would submit that insofar as the two poles, which are existing now, are located in Survey No. 119/9A7D, which belongs to the first respondent. ______________ Page No. 4 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.544 of 2013

9. If at all the pole has to be shifted on the other side of the road concerned, it would be shifted to Survey No.196 which belongs to the local body as a public road and therefore, there was no proposal on the part of the TANGEDCO to shift the pole from the existing area to the land belongs to the appellant, ie., Survey No.119/4A.

10. The said stand taken by the TANGEDCO is taken on record. In this context, Mr.K.N.Thambi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that insofar as the property belongs to the appellant in Survey No.119/4A is concerned, the TANGEDCO should not be permitted to shift their poles and erect in that land or even if they erect the poles on the other side of the road, which, according to the TANGEDCO is in Survey No.196 between two poles, if the TANGEDCO wants to draw the line, the line also should not take across the land or property belongs to the appellant at Survey No.119/4A.

11. This apprehension expressed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant also has been met out by the learned Standing counsel ______________ Page No. 5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.544 of 2013 appearing for the TANGEDCO, who would submit that in turn, the poles would not be erected in Survey No.119/4A and the electrical line would not be drawn between two poles to be erected or shifted across the property belongs to the appellant situated at Survey No.119/4A.

12. In view of the said stand taken by the TANGEDCO, the plea raised by the appellant in this appeal since has been redressed or the prayer has been accomplished by recording the aforestated stand of the TANGEDCO as well as the first respondent, this Court feel that this writ appeal can be disposed of by giving a quietus, accordingly, it is disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                         [R.S.K.,J.] & [K.K.R.K.,J.]
                                                                29.03.2023

                  Index    : Yes / No
                  Internet : Yes / No
                  NCC      : Yes/No
                  PJL


                  To
                  The Assistant Engineer,
                  O&M/TNEB/Nagaram,
                  Kulasekaram,
                  Kanyakumari District.

                  ______________
                    Page No. 6 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                               W.A(MD)No.544 of 2013



                                         R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
                                                      and
                                      K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.


                                                              PJL




                                        W.A(MD)No.544 of 2013
                                                          and
                                          M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013




                                                      29.03.2023




                  ______________
                    Page No. 7 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis