Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Dr.Sadachari Singh Tomar vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 25 March, 2011

                           Central Information Commission
                             2nd Floor, Room No. 305 B-Wing,
                                   August Kranti Bhawan
                                    Bhikaji Kama Place
                                         New Delhi
                                                                Case No. CIC/SS/A/2010/001193

       Name of Appellant                      :       Dr. Sadachari Singh Tomar
                                                            (The Appellant was present)



       Name of Respondent                     :       M/o Home Affairs (PM Division), Mansingh Road
                                                      (Represented by Sh. Lokesh Jha, Jt. 
                                                      Sec. (PP) and Sh. N. I. Chowdhary, 
                                                      DS(VS))


       The matter was heard on                :       23.03.2011


                                                  ORDER
 

  Dr.   Sadachari   Singh   Tomar,   the   Appellant,   filed   an   RTI   application   dated  27.02.2010 seeking information regarding security arrangements for Swami Ramdev, and  matters   connected   therewith.     The   PIO   vide   letter   dated   10.05.2010   informed   the  Appellant that information on points 1 to 10 cannot be provided to the Appellant, as these  are exempted under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. and  with regard to point number 11,  the Appellant was informed that his representation dated 26.02.2010, has already been  forwarded to the Govt. of Uttrakhand, for appropriate action as under the Constitution of  India, 'Law & Order' is a State subject, hence it is the responsibility of the concerned  state / Union Territory Govt. to provide adequate security to the individuals within their  area of jurisdiction.  Not satisfied with the reply the Appellant filed an appeal before the  First Appellate Authority (FAA).  Finally, not getting information to his satisfaction even  after filing first appeal, the Appellant has filed the present appeal before the Commission.

The Appellant during the hearing submits that complete information has not been  provided to him.  The Respondent, on the other hand, in a written submission submits as  follows:­ "Query   raised   by   the   applicant:   supply   of   documents   and   Permission   to   Inspect   the   relevant file(s) in respect of Security Arrangements for Swami Ramdev.

Reply : On   the   following   grounds,   supply   of   documents   and   inspection   of   the   relevant file cannot be permitted to the applicant:­

(i) The   relevant   file   (Security   arrangements   for   Swami   Ramdev)   in   which   his   representation dated 26.02.2010 was examined contains inputs received from   Central Security Agencies disclosure of which is exempted under section 24(1)   of the RTI Act­2005.

(ii) Information, the disclosure of which should endanger the life of physical safety of   any   person   or   identify   the   source   of   information   or   assistance   given   in   confidence   for   law   enforcement   or   security   purposes   is   exempted   under   Section 8(1)(g) of the RTI Act­2005.

(iii) Information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has   no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which cause unwarranted   invasion of the privacy of the individuals is exempted from disclosure under   section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act­2005.

(iv) Meanwhile State government of Uttarakhand vide its wireless message dated   27th January 2011 has informed all concerned including MHA that Z category   Security has been provided to Swami Ramdev by State Govt. of Uttarakhand."

After hearing the parties and on perusal of the relevant documents on   file, and  having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, the Commission deems it fit to  direct the CPIO to provide a copy of letter received from the State Govt. of Uttarakhand,  vide   its   wireless   message   dated   27.01.2011   informing   all   concerned,   including   M/o  Home Affairs, that Z category security has been provided to Swami Ramdev by the State  Govt., within 7 days of receipt of this order,  The Commission finds no reason to interfere in respect of replies to other points of  the Respondents.

With the aforementioned observations / directions the matter is disposed of on the  part of the Commission.

(Sushma Singh)                                                                            Information Commissioner  25.03.2011 Authenticated true copy (S. Padmanabha) Under Secretary & Dy. Registrar  Copy to:

1. Dr. Sadachari Singh Tomar C-101, NASC Residential Complex Pusa, New Delhi-110012
2. The Public Information Officer Director (VS) Govt. of India M/o Home Affairs (PM Division) Jaisalmer House

26 Mansingh Road New Delhi-110011

3. The Appellate Authority Jt. Secretary (PP) M/o Home Affairs (PM Division) 9th Floor, C-Wing Lok Nayak Bhawan Khan Market New Delhi-110003