Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Dilip Mahto @ Dilip Kumar Suman vs The State Of Bihar on 30 March, 2026

Author: Sandeep Kumar

Bench: Sandeep Kumar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91612 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2024 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Dilip Mahto @ Dilip Kumar Suman S/O Raj Kumar Mahto R/O Village-
                 Basopatti, P.s- Basopatti, District- Madhubani

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Abhay Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   30-03-2026

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 170 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 8, 20(B)iiC and 24 of the NDPS Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 13536 capsules of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus, 50 injection of Pentazocine, 5700 pieces of Nitrovet, 2200 tablets of Nitrazepam and 5850 bottles of exiplon cough syrup were recovered from house of petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. Petitioner is in custody since 09.06.2025.

5. Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91612 of 2025(4) dt.30-03-2026 2/2 is recovery of huge quantity of contraband from the petitioner.

6. Considering the recovery of huge quantity of contraband from the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected.

8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/-

U       T