Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Daimler India Commercial Vehicles ... vs Pal Sales And Service Private Limited on 14 October, 2025

Author: Dipankar Datta

Bench: Dipankar Datta

                                                           1

     ITEM NO.19                                  COURT NO.9                     SECTION XI-B

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28514/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-09-2025
     in MA No. 37/2025 passed by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and
     Ladakh at Jammu]

     DAIMLER INDIA COMMERCIAL VEHICLES PRIVATE LIMITED                           Petitioner(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     PAL SALES AND SERVICE PRIVATE LIMITED                                       Respondent(s)

     FOR ADMISSION
     IA No. 252542/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/
     ANNEXURES

     Date : 14-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

     For Petitioner(s) :Mr. C. Aryama Sundaram, Sr. Adv.
                        Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv.
                        Mr. Sidharth Sethi, AOR
                        Ms. Shreya Sircar, Adv.
                        Mr. Kunal Saini, Adv.
                        Ms. Riya Singh, Adv.

     For Respondent(s) :Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv.
                        Ms. Neeha Nagpal, Adv.
                        Mr. Rohan Jaitley, Adv.
                        Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, AOR

                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                   O R D E R

1. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the High Court; hence, the special leave petition is dismissed.

2. However, it is clarified that the application under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 1 JATINDER KAUR Date: 2025.10.14 17:17:14 IST shall stand revived and the same be heard Reason: together with the application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 read with Section 151 1 CPC 2 CPC. Both the applications be decided on its own merits by the trial court as early as possible.

3. All points are kept open

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.





(JATINDER KAUR)                                       (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)
P.S. to REGISTRAR                                       COURT MASTER (NSH)