Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 6]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

The State Of Rajasthan vs Kashiram S/O Shri Lekhram on 2 July, 2019

Bench: Mohammad Rafiq, Narendra Singh Dhaddha

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                 BENCH AT JAIPUR

            D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 108/2019
                                      In
               S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.7532/2018

1.   The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To The Govt.
     Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
     Jaipur.
2.   Rajasthan Madarsa Board, Rajasthan Madarsa Board
     Bhawan, Dr.s. Radha Krishan Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg,
     Jaipur, Through Its Secretary
3.   Rajasthan Shiksha Karmi Board, Shiksha Sankul Pancham
     Block Fifth Floor, Jln Marg, Jaipur Through Its Secretary
4.   Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.)
5.   District     Education        Officer       (Elementary        Education),
     Sriganganagar (Raj.)
                                                                 ----Appellants
                                   Versus
1.   Kashiram S/o Shri Lekhram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 33
     Ml, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, District Ganganagar, At Present
     Working As Para-Teacher At Govt. Upper Primary School
     33 Mlb (Raisinghnagar)
2.   Rajendra Kumar S/o Thakardas, R/o Gram Panchayat
     Dabla,     Tehsil   Raisinghnagar,           District     Ganganagar,      At
     Present Working As Para-Teacher At Govt. Primary School
     3 Msd A Raisinghnagar
3.   Siyaram S/o Nihal Chand, R/o 35 Ml Beriwali Post Dabla,
     Gram        Panchayat         12        Nrdc        Bishanpura,         Tehsil
     Raisinghnagar, District Ganganagar, At Present Working
     As   Para-Teacher        At     Govt.      Primary        School   15     Nrd
     Raisinghnagar
4.   Darshan Singh S/o Jit Singh, R/o Village 2 Fdb, Gram
     Panchayat Khayaliwala 6Fd, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, District
     Ganganagar, At Present Working As Para-Teacher At Govt.
     Primary School 2 Fdb Raisinghnagar
5.   Geeta Devi W/o Ramesh Chand, R/o Village 2 Fdb, Gram
     Panchayat      Khayaliwala            (6Fd),     Tehsil     Raisinghnagar,
     District Ganganagar, At Present Working As Para-Teacher
     At Govt. Primary School 2 Fdb Raisinghnagar

                   (Downloaded on 09/07/2019 at 11:02:39 PM)
                                           (2 of 3)                  [SAW-108/2019]


6.     Sabana Parveen W/o Mohd. Nawaz, R/o Village Udaipur,
       Tehsil Suratgarh, District Ganganagar, At Present Working
       As Para-Teacher At Madarsa School Udaipur
7.     Amarpal Kaur D/o Ajaib Singh, R/o Village Nandewali
       Dhanni, Post Amar Singh Wala, Tehsil Pili Banga District
       Hanumangarh, At Present Working As Para-Teacher At
       Govt. Primary School 2 Psm Raisinghnagar
                                                                 ----Respondents
For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. C. L. Saini, AAG
For Respondent(s)         :


         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 02/07/2019 Defects are overruled.

There is delay in filing of this appeal. The appellants have filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay.

For stated reasons, the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed. The delay in filing appeal is condoned.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants. Mr. C.L. Saini, learned Additional Advocate General who appears on behalf of the appellants-State, submits that this matter is squarely covered by order dated 20.09.2018 of a Coordinate Bench of this court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ)No.970/2018 - The State of Rajasthan and Others Vs. Smt. Itee Shri Maheshwari.

It is submitted that the respondents, who were the writ- petitioners, stated before the Court in the writ petition that they were para teachers. They claimed parity with Teacher Gr.III and (Downloaded on 09/07/2019 at 11:02:39 PM) (3 of 3) [SAW-108/2019] Prabodhaks. The learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition on the very first date of listing without notice to the appellants herein. The principle of law culled out by the learned Single Judge is 'equal pay for equal work'. There are two infirmities in the impugned order. The first is violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents were not issued a notice before the direction was issued. Secondly, para teachers were claiming equivalence with 'Prabodhaks' and Teacher Gr.III. and without deciding equivalence, impugned order has been passed.

Learned Additional Advocate General submitted that judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Punjab & Others Vs. Jagjit Singh & Others, (2017) 1 SCC 148, relying upon which the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondents without notice to the appellants, has itself been distinguished by the Supreme Court in State Bihar & Others Vs. The Bihar Secondary Teachers Struggle Committee, Munger &Others (Civil Appeal No. 4862/2019 and other connected matters decided on 10.05.2019).

The appeal is disposed of setting aside the impugned order. The writ petition is restored to its original number for adjudication before the learned Single Judge with a request that after granting the appellants, who are the respondents in the writ petition, opportunity of filing a reply to the writ petition, the same be decided in accordance with the law.

This also disposes of the stay application No.885/2019. Application No. 97134/2018 also stands disposed of. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J RS/Gourav-04 (Downloaded on 09/07/2019 at 11:02:39 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)