Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

M/S. Maithan Ispat Ltd vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opp. ... on 6 April, 2024

Author: K.R. Mohapatra

Bench: K.R. Mohapatra

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO
Designation: Senior Stenographer
Reason: Authentication
Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack
Date: 06-Apr-2024 14:51:09                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                                                 W.P.(C) No. 26269 OF 2011
                                               M/s. Maithan Ispat Ltd., Bhubaneswar ....         Petitioners
                                               and another
                                                                               Mr. P.P. Mohanty, Advocate
                                                                         -versus-
                                               State of Odisha and others               .... Opp. Parties
                                                                        Mr. N.C. Panigrahi, Senior Advocate
                                                                     being assisted by Mr. D. Dhal, Advocate

                                                     CORAM:
                                                     JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
                                                                      ORDER
                      Order No.                                      06.04.2024
                           8.             1.       This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioners in this writ petition pray for a direction to the Opposite Parties to accept the recommendation of Director of Industries-Opposite Party No.6 for complete exemption of electricity duty in respect of 30 captive power plant of Petitioner No.1-Company.

3. Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioners by filing a memo submits that he has no instruction in the matter. Memo so filed is taken on record.

4. Mr. Panigrahi, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Energy Department submits that an outstanding of more than Rs.9,47,000,00/- was pending against the Petitioner No.1 till June, 2011.

5. In view of the memo filed, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.


                                                                              (K.R. Mohapatra)
              ms                                                                    Judge


                                                                                                   Page 1 of 1