Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs M/S Supreme Placement Services Pvt. Ltd on 8 July, 2022

Author: Manmohan

Bench: Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

                              $~2
                              *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                              +     ITA 186/2022 and CM APPL. 29754/2022
                                    PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
                                    INCOME TAX, DELHI - 07             ..... Appellant
                                                 Through : Mr. Sunil Aggarwal, Senior Standing
                                                           Counsel along with Mr. Tushar
                                                           Gupta, Junior Standing Counsel and
                                                           Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocate.

                                                       versus

                                    M/S SUPREME PLACEMENT
                                    SERVICES PVT. LTD.                   ..... Respondent
                                                   Through : Mr. Udit Naresh, Advocate               for
                                                             Ms.Kavita Jha, Advocate.

                              CORAM:
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
                              HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
                                                   ORDER

% 08.07.2022 CM APPL. 29754/2022 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

ITA 186/2022

Present Income Tax Appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 18th March, 2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 5650/Del./2016 for Assessment Year 2012-13.

Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the ITAT has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.72,43,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Signing Date:11.07.2022 17:04:34

Issue notice. Mr. Udit Naresh, learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.

List on 2nd November, 2022 along with I.T.A. No. 1/2022.

MANMOHAN, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J JULY 8, 2022 j Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Signing Date:11.07.2022 17:04:34